Quantcast
1st Pass-Around Effort . Cleaver Anyone ? - Page 2
Closed Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 49

Thread: 1st Pass-Around Effort . Cleaver Anyone ?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    WildBoar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    NoVa
    Posts
    2,090
    I'd like to log some cutting board time with the cleaver as well, but I am also lacking in cleaver experience so my main feedback would be how it works for me vs how it compares to other cleavers (although that may not entirely be a bad thing). I hope you decide to go through with this, as it sounds like it will be fun.
    __________
    David (WildBoar's Kitchen)

  2. #12

    echerub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,777
    If there's still space, I'd like to be in on a clever passaround.

    I've been alternating through 3 different cleavers these past few weeks - I go through cycles on which of my knives I use most, and right now I think I'm in a cleaver cycle. I'm finding that balance and edge profile are making the biggest differences for me. All 3 have nice wa handles, but I remember when I used a CCK, even the little round wooden handle is fine. The handle on a cleaver, I feel, isn't a big deal.

    I personally prefer a flatter edge profile on my cleaver. I haven't tried the Butch Harner style nakiri edge - flat at the back with slight tip curve - but it looks very interesting. As long as there's a healthy length of flat edge in the profile, I think I'd be happy. A gentle curve most of the way through would turn me off.

    I really don't know how heavy or light my cleavers are. I'm guessing they're middle-of-the-road in the 400-500g range. They're in 220, 240 and 270 lengths, but they are pretty thin so weight-wise they're still quite comfortable. The conventional 220 length is perfectly good, I think.

    Balance point doesn't affect how well I like to use the cleaver, but it does affect how quickly my hand "melds" with the cleaver in use, as it were.

    As for edge retention... I don't think I'm any harder on a cleaver's edge than I am with a gyuto or nakiri. I don't think that needs to be a special concern just because it's a cleaver.

    It would be really interesting to be in on a cleaver passaround

    BTW, I think Andy777 needs to be on the passaround list. I'm one of those folks who wouldn't have delved into cleavers if it weren't for his influence
    Len

  3. #13
    Impressively pointed
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Westchester Co , NY
    Posts
    33
    Some great feedback already. Any names for the actual passaround will be decided after I get started. I'm going to the ECG so I'd love to talk about this project there with anyone who'll listen.

  4. #14
    Senior Member EdipisReks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, Oh
    Posts
    3,472
    Quote Originally Posted by tk59 View Post
    I think the reason you don't see cleavers is 1. a lot of people don't use them and 2. it's hard to get a consistent grind across the entire face of the blade. I wouldn't mind checking out a nice cleaver but if feedback is what you want, I probably wouldn't be a great choice since I have virtually no experience wielding them. I'm assuming you mean a chinese slicer as opposed to a meat cleaver.
    i'm in exactly the same boat.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    498
    I love using my cleavers (slicers), they really are very versatile.

    Love to be in on the passaround and i'll come back on design thoughts soon.

    Thanks

    Robin

  6. #16
    Senior Member Potato42's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    296
    Whoa I don't know how I missed this discussion! For my preferences mainaman pretty much has it here

    Quote Originally Posted by mainaman View Post
    If you are asking me, I like the cleaver to be in 420-450g range, the geometry has to be really good, it should not need to be thinned to improve performance.
    Profile is important too, I like less belly. Steel has to be with good edge retention, it is cleaver and will see more banging than a knife.
    the weight of the cleaver (or chuckabocho) is really the important thing. There is a lot of variation on size but the feel of the knife is determined more by the overall weight, as well as shape and size of the handle than anything else. This is because most #6 slicing cleavers are nearly flat at the edge. A great grind and profile, and great distal taper makes for an excellent knife. I personally like something a tad shorter too, most #6 cleavers are around 220mm and 110mm tall, and I like 210mm and 100mm tall. This allows for a moderately lighter knife for the same profile and taper and I don't really miss 10mm of usable edge that much.

    I think the temper is extremely important too. A lot of guys around here like really hard knives, but I think it's a mistake to make a cleaver as hard as you would a suji or gyuto because it is expected it will be whacking the cutting board occasionally depending on how you're cutting. I usually use push/pull cuts myself, but a cleaver lends itself so well to chopping that sometimes you just need to let the knife do it's thing.

    For a handle I like the shorter, fatter and stubbier western style handles rather than the wa. I would study the handles "Fish" did back in the day on cleavers for the perfect design. Another possibility is a turned handle, like what you see on CCK cleavers, but finished to a much higher level. I think they're plenty comfy in hand, but they stain easily during sharpening and they're ugly as a ken onion shun. Ok maybe not that ugly, but they're not pretty
    - Sean

  7. #17

    echerub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,777
    Hmm... it's interesting to hear how a different user finds the handles to make a big difference For me, a shaped handle - though cosmetically very nice - wouldn't make any difference in terms of handling and might even be a detriment.

    I did some poking around, because I don't have a scale handy here, and I think my cleavers are around the 400g mark. The big one might be a bit more, but from what I can find the 220 and 240 are just around 400g. They do feel different though due to a difference in balance.

    For me, a tall height is a really good thing. Even with gyuto, I prefer taller ones. I don't know if I'd miss a 10mm difference in a cleaver size, but I certainly don't mind a taller
    Len

  8. #18
    Senior Member Potato42's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    296
    I hear ya on the handles Len, honestly I don't think it's of much importance on a cleaver either. For me when I grip a cleaver, the only part of my hand that really comes in contact much with the handle is the upper part of my palm below my ring and pinky fingers. My thumb and index finger rest on the blade and my middle finger wraps underneath the handle or joins my index finger. Even though this is the case I find I like a taller handle when viewing the profile from the side, and fatter also seems more comfortable. I like stubby because it just seems to look right proportionally, and because of the balance being kept forward.
    - Sean

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Rockport, TX
    Posts
    4,892
    I think that because they have made themselves this way, cleavers tend to take up a rather inexpensive slot in the knife market. There are higher-end cleavers, but only a few of us(and that's saying something) know much about them.

  10. #20
    Impressively pointed
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Westchester Co , NY
    Posts
    33
    Some thoughts on this ..
    Cleaver with distal taper .. ? I don't want to make just a sharpened slab ..
    Thickness - I was going to start with steel .103" or 2 1/2 mm at its thickest .
    And what about the front ? I've seen them use that part to descale fish , but what about veggies ? Flat , convex or concave ?

Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts