I have some questions to ask here.
It appears clear to me that while some members appreciate the unique position that I'm in to provide honest feedback on issues that I see with knifemakers (whose knives I handle by the hundreds) there are also many others who see it as mud slinging on my behalf should I say something negative.
I've testified many times over that I simply speak the truth about what I see, hoping to help fellow community members in not getting burnt, nothing more or less. I always hoped that my word would be good enough and that people could see the information for what it is but I'm often challenged by nay-sayers so I know that this isn't true. I know that a lot of people don't understand honesty (seeing in others what they themselves can not provide) and to these folks my reviews (warnings) are seen as venomous. I'm certain that my public persona/reputation is negatively affected by reporting knife (maker) problems.
Currently I'm feeling that I'm sticking my neck out for the few who want the truth just to be slit by the many who do not.
So my questions for all members are...
1. Do you like to be alerted to problems like Takeda is currently experiencing with making knives different (thicker/wedgier) than they have in the past or say a problem like Moritaka has always had (holes in the edge that pop up when sharpening)?
2. Would it better if I kept my mouth shut about such issues?
3. Perhaps the truth shouldn't be spoken by someone who could be listed as a competitor? Maybe it's best left to the consumers to find out (or not) what they've purchased and do the reporting instead?
4. Do you only want positive reports/reviews?
5. Is there room for negative reviews in this community?
6. If you were in my shoes, seeing so many knives, what would you do? Would you speak up and help someone to save their hard earned cash or sit back and keep quiet, not rocking the boat, keeping your public image in tact?
Please, any and all input is welcome.
It appears clear to me that while some members appreciate the unique position that I'm in to provide honest feedback on issues that I see with knifemakers (whose knives I handle by the hundreds) there are also many others who see it as mud slinging on my behalf should I say something negative.
I've testified many times over that I simply speak the truth about what I see, hoping to help fellow community members in not getting burnt, nothing more or less. I always hoped that my word would be good enough and that people could see the information for what it is but I'm often challenged by nay-sayers so I know that this isn't true. I know that a lot of people don't understand honesty (seeing in others what they themselves can not provide) and to these folks my reviews (warnings) are seen as venomous. I'm certain that my public persona/reputation is negatively affected by reporting knife (maker) problems.
Currently I'm feeling that I'm sticking my neck out for the few who want the truth just to be slit by the many who do not.
So my questions for all members are...
1. Do you like to be alerted to problems like Takeda is currently experiencing with making knives different (thicker/wedgier) than they have in the past or say a problem like Moritaka has always had (holes in the edge that pop up when sharpening)?
2. Would it better if I kept my mouth shut about such issues?
3. Perhaps the truth shouldn't be spoken by someone who could be listed as a competitor? Maybe it's best left to the consumers to find out (or not) what they've purchased and do the reporting instead?
4. Do you only want positive reports/reviews?
5. Is there room for negative reviews in this community?
6. If you were in my shoes, seeing so many knives, what would you do? Would you speak up and help someone to save their hard earned cash or sit back and keep quiet, not rocking the boat, keeping your public image in tact?
Please, any and all input is welcome.