I just use a yanagi as an example.
For traditional J-knives, we often see ebony/ivory(or blonde buffalo ferrule)/ginmaki combination is for true high-end knives. However, what I did not understand well is the price difference between the knife with a fancy handle and a knife from the same line but with a typical magnolia handle; A handle alone should not explain the difference.
Then, the only other difference should be the quality of a blade, right?
Provided two blades are from the same bladesmith, do Japanese brands really try to differentiate the final blade quality by having different handles? or is it just a different scheme of profit max by having a fancier handle on the same quality blades??
For traditional J-knives, we often see ebony/ivory(or blonde buffalo ferrule)/ginmaki combination is for true high-end knives. However, what I did not understand well is the price difference between the knife with a fancy handle and a knife from the same line but with a typical magnolia handle; A handle alone should not explain the difference.
Then, the only other difference should be the quality of a blade, right?
Provided two blades are from the same bladesmith, do Japanese brands really try to differentiate the final blade quality by having different handles? or is it just a different scheme of profit max by having a fancier handle on the same quality blades??