Quantcast
Petty profile critique
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Petty profile critique

  1. #1
    Mike Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Jackson, MI.
    Posts
    1,529

    Petty profile critique

    I started a few petty blanks, based off what i think should cut well. I have only seen a few petty's so i really have no idea lol.
    These have not been HT'd yet as i started with 1/8" stock and reduced thickness on the belt grinder....


    They are rough ground in right now but, what do you guys think?

  2. #2
    52100?

  3. #3
    I forgot. Like the profile on the right one.

  4. #4
    Senior Member heirkb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    898
    I don't have much experience at all, but so far I'm finding that I like flatter profiles more and more. It's just easier to get clean cuts quickly for me with a nice flat profile. Some might not care about that on a petty, but I would. The left one would be my preference.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cardiff, UK
    Posts
    801
    Hard without a sense of scale but the left one looks promising, though I would prefer the spine to drop more quickly to make it more like a small suji than a small gyuto, just personal preference though.

    What's the thickness like on the right one? Is it single beveled?

  6. #6
    Mike Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Jackson, MI.
    Posts
    1,529
    They are both O-1. Thickness is right around .100 right now, but i plan on taking them both to about .075 before i final sand. Length is roughly 6 inch blade...Right on is about 1/4 inch shorter i think. The left is a full flat grind while the left is a half height flat, ground both sides. These are both for me in my kitchen, as more of a test thing. I will see which one performs the best for me, and thats what i will refine down the road. next ones will be W2 with hamon's...well that's the plan anyway lol.

    I have some 52100 but it is 2" diameter round bar....Need to squish it down.

    Thanks for the input guys, Keep it coming hoping to eventually make some knives to sell and want to get it right.

    Mike

  7. #7
    I like a petty more like a small Gyuto, but then again I have honosukis for coring and I have lots of other petties. The #1 small knife in my kitchen is Carter Fuyniaki



    The DT is to flat for me, but I can manage using it as well :P
    Still I really liked your profile on the right knife To bad its not stainless

  8. #8
    Marko Tsourkan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    4,084
    Two different knives, two different profiles. One is a petty and another is a petty chef.

    M


    "If there’s something worth doing, it’s worth overdoing.” - An US saying.

    If my KKF Inbox is full (or not), please contact me via Email: anvlts@gmail.com

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    1,297
    Kind of off topic, but do you guys really think that 52100 is better than W2 or even O1 or has the opinion that 52100 is the be all, end all of carbon steel for kitchen knives have more to do with the fact that a number of the well known American smiths who jumped into the high end kitchen knife game happened to be guys who use 52100?

  10. #10

    ecchef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In the Village.
    Posts
    3,186
    The one on the left has a nice profile. Maybe a little too tall for me. Not a huge fan of 'wa' handled pettys though.
    Though I could not caution all I still might warn a few; Don't raise your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools. - Robert Hunter

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts