TheDispossessed
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 988
- Reaction score
- 8
I thought some of you might be interested in my amateur observations and poor photos of two really stellar little knives.
The 180mm Wa-Petty is one of my favorite knife styles. I think it's extremely versatile and attractive to boot.
Here's a quick comparison of a Kato 'Workhorse' and Shig Kitaeji
Both weigh just under 100g
Both are almost exactly 180mm from heel to tip
Both are about 33-34mm tall
Kitaeji pattern shows best in low light.
You can see a huge difference in the length of the exposed tang, 10 vs 20mm. My preference would be the longer space on the Shig. I tend to like using shorter knives and backing away on the handle to make them act longer. I do not like a choked up handle on a knife, like on many takedas.
The Kato remains thick throughout the spine with a somewhat even taper while the Shig has that drastic bulge at the base of the tang. Both are fine in my opinion, as long as there's enough heft near the handle and heel to give the blade some sturdiness (flex isn't my thing).
I have used the Kato little, and the Shig not at all. But the choils, if they can be trusted suggest better performance to me of the Kato.
I anticipate selling one of these knives soon, as I can't justify keeping them both. As mentioned, I can't offer up any performance observations here. The Shig may very well remain a collector's piece for now and not see any use as I'm kind of worshipping it's beauty.
Cheers!
Matteo
The 180mm Wa-Petty is one of my favorite knife styles. I think it's extremely versatile and attractive to boot.
Here's a quick comparison of a Kato 'Workhorse' and Shig Kitaeji
Both weigh just under 100g
Both are almost exactly 180mm from heel to tip
Both are about 33-34mm tall
Kitaeji pattern shows best in low light.
You can see a huge difference in the length of the exposed tang, 10 vs 20mm. My preference would be the longer space on the Shig. I tend to like using shorter knives and backing away on the handle to make them act longer. I do not like a choked up handle on a knife, like on many takedas.
The Kato remains thick throughout the spine with a somewhat even taper while the Shig has that drastic bulge at the base of the tang. Both are fine in my opinion, as long as there's enough heft near the handle and heel to give the blade some sturdiness (flex isn't my thing).
I have used the Kato little, and the Shig not at all. But the choils, if they can be trusted suggest better performance to me of the Kato.
I anticipate selling one of these knives soon, as I can't justify keeping them both. As mentioned, I can't offer up any performance observations here. The Shig may very well remain a collector's piece for now and not see any use as I'm kind of worshipping it's beauty.
Cheers!
Matteo