Stones for western stainless

Japanese Knives - by Tokushu Knife
Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Nemo

Nemo

Staff member
Global Moderators
KKF Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
7,541
Reaction score
3,932
Location
NSW (Aus)
Hi all, I have a set of Choseras (400,1k,3k) and a Junpaku which I quite like for my Japanese knives. The 400 is a bit lean for serious thinning but that is the subject of another thread.

I am beginning to realise that a much of the sharpening that I do is on (other people's) western stainless, often with a bit of shoulder easing or repair of pull thru abuse. For this I use the 400 and do a final deburr on 1k. It works fine but I wonder whether there is a better option for western stainless or at least if there is a cheaper option which is just as good or fast.

FWIW, I'm in Australia.

Thanks for your input.
 
Not cheaper nor more efficient but for western stainless or stainless in general I use Omura + Ikarashi. I don't sharpen for a ton of people, though. Just my close friends and family so their knives are kept in fairly good condition as I see to them often enough. Honestly, for years I used a Norton India stone and it worked well enough.
 
Aw shucks, I have a similar problem of looking for a coarse stone for pesky stainless stuff (but something I can still use with carbon). I did a lot of forum searching and just settled on either a Naniwa super or pro 400 and now you've made me second guess myself! :scratchhead:

I'll follow this to see what's recommended now compared to all the old threads.
 
DanDan said:
Aw shucks, I have a similar problem of looking for a coarse stone for pesky stainless stuff (but something I can still use with carbon). I did a lot of forum searching and just settled on either a Naniwa super or pro 400 and now you've made me second guess myself! :scratchhead:

I'll follow this to see what's recommended now compared to all the old threads.
Click to expand...

Well the Chosera 400 (?same as pro) works fine. I was really just asking if there's anything better out there. I guess it almost looks as though I'm looking for an excuse to buy a new stone :whistling:
 
The Sigma Select II could maybe work?

My 1200 and 3000 are super fast and work great with all SS. I like them a lot and that makes me interested in the 240 and 400 too. They also have a quite friendly price tag. I'll probably buy those at some point, just don't need them right now.

If anyone has some experience with them I'd love hear about them.
 
Marcelo Amaral said:
You can find omura at Watanabe-san and Yamashita-san:

http://www.kitchen-knife.jp/special/wetstone8.htm

http://www.japan-tool.com/zc/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=43_3

Another coarse stone that could fit the bill (never tried it yet, though) is Sasaguchi-do.
Click to expand...

Sasaguchi is on my list as well but I have been happy enough with my Omura that I have not tried anything else quite that coarse. I did just order the Iyodo that Watanabe just got in.

Anyway, I too think Omura would be a good fit here. I love mine for stainless, really I do.
 
K813zra said:
Sasaguchi is on my list as well but I have been happy enough with my Omura that I have not tried anything else quite that coarse. I did just order the Iydo that Watanabe just got in.

Anyway, I too think Omura would be a good fit here. I love mine for stainless, really I do.
Click to expand...

Nice! I wonder how your Iyo-do compares to the one i've got from Asteger last year. I'm not sure, but i think mine is this one (maybe Asteger will chime in and correct me if i'm wrong): http://www.japanesenaturalstones.com/vintage-iyoto/
Let us know how do you like yours!
 
Nemo said:
Well the Chosera 400 (?same as pro) works fine. I was really just asking if there's anything better out there. I guess it almost looks as though I'm looking for an excuse to buy a new stone :whistling:
Click to expand...

Yeah they're the same. Well if there's something better out there I'll regret my choice! I'm not sure whether this is good advice, but the Sigma power #120 from toolsfromjapan fits the "cheaper" requirement. I just dug up a pretty recent thread on it here.

The JNS 300 did consistently come up in my searches though, shame it's out of stock.

JaVa said:
The Sigma Select II could maybe work?

My 1200 and 3000 are super fast and work great with all SS. I like them a lot and that makes me interested in the 240 and 400 too. They also have a quite friendly price tag. I'll probably buy those at some point, just don't need them right now.

If anyone has some experience with them I'd love hear about them.
Click to expand...

This was recommended in a thread I made and it looks really fitting. I can get the 240 locally but the 400 I would have to order in from toolsfromjapan or elsewhere (is there anywhere else that stocks it at a good price?). It's tempting to go grab the 240, but I don't have a medium stone lower than 1000 so I'm unsure about jumping from 240 to deburring on 1000. I'd also like to find out more info about them, there's not much out there.
 
Fine-tools.com has the Sigma Select II line in stock, but it's in Germany so I don't know if that helps?
 
Nemo said:
Do you mean Atoma 400? Is there any issue with the soft satinless pulling diamonds out?

Do the shapton glass perform better in soft stainless? I thought that they were ideal for harder steels.
Click to expand...

I have never heard the diamond being pulled off from the plate. Atoma 140 would be a better option since you already have something in 400 range. It is more aggressive than atoma 400.

Shapton is very good for alloyed tool steel like A2. So It should handle softer stainless petty well.
 
I have a JNS 300. It does cut fast, but it is a very muddy stone. In my opinion, it more for Japanese single or wide bevel knives with kasumi finish.
 
42537703 said:
I have a JNS 300. It does cut fast, but it is a very muddy stone. In my opinion, it more for Japanese single or wide bevel knives with kasumi finish.
Click to expand...

I use it all the time to sharpen cheap stainless and it works fine. It seems that the omura leave a better edge retention, but that might be a false impression.
 
Nemo said:
Do you use them with oil, water or dry?

Are these like the Norton combo stones that one might find at the hardware store?
Click to expand...

I used an IB8 Norton for years and it worked well. Those cheap stones from the dollar markets do actually work. I use them on cheap tools and the like. But Norton oil stones are cheap enough that I would get that. I ran mine through the dishwasher a few times and used it with water rather than oil. I'm not suggesting that you should do the same, just saying what I did.
 
DanDan said:
It's tempting to go grab the 240, but I don't have a medium stone lower than 1000 so I'm unsure about jumping from 240 to deburring on 1000.
Click to expand...

I'm no sharpening pro but I use a 240 grit Naniwa Traditional (the cheapest one, it's below Super-stone and professional) and then go to a traditional 1000. The jump from 240 to 1000 works extremely well. And I got a professional 3000 to finish, I heard that you don't get much from german knives by taking them above 3000.

I also do lots of sharpening for friends who have horribly blunted/rounded/chipped stainless. My mindset is that it's going to eat up a lot of your stone, whichever one you use... so I got a naniwa traditional 240 to work fast for cheap. Once it gets worn down completely I will just get another. They work very well.
 
Khorax said:
I'm no sharpening pro but I use a 240 grit Naniwa Traditional (the cheapest one, it's below Super-stone and professional) and then go to a traditional 1000. The jump from 240 to 1000 works extremely well. And I got a professional 3000 to finish, I heard that you don't get much from german knives by taking them above 3000.

I also do lots of sharpening for friends who have horribly blunted/rounded/chipped stainless. My mindset is that it's going to eat up a lot of your stone, whichever one you use... so I got a naniwa traditional 240 to work fast for cheap. Once it gets worn down completely I will just get another. They work very well.
Click to expand...

That's a good point, coarse stones get worn down quickly anyway, I've decided not to drop the money on a Sigma and go more budget. I'm not so worried about jumping grits anymore. More that I preferred a splash and go and I was worried that 220-320 might be too low grit for my needs right now. Although I do have some other stainless knives that need new edges. I could get a Norton 220 locally cheaper than shipping in a Naniwa 220, but I can't find much on it other than bad impressions. Or I could get the Suehiro New Cerax 320/800 and kill two birds with one stone... technically. I'm still undecided as there are lots of options.
 
Khorax said:
I'm no sharpening pro but I use a 240 grit Naniwa Traditional (the cheapest one, it's below Super-stone and professional) and then go to a traditional 1000. The jump from 240 to 1000 works extremely well. And I got a professional 3000 to finish, I heard that you don't get much from german knives by taking them above 3000.

I also do lots of sharpening for friends who have horribly blunted/rounded/chipped stainless. My mindset is that it's going to eat up a lot of your stone, whichever one you use... so I got a naniwa traditional 240 to work fast for cheap. Once it gets worn down completely I will just get another. They work very well.
Click to expand...

The Naniwa Tradtional line is actually pretty good. They have 2 220 grit stone one is alox (pink) and the other is SiC (green). Their whole is good and I would not say they are under the super stone. They also have 2 type of 1000 grit, one is clay binder and the other vitreous. Pretty good and diverse line up.
 
galvaude said:
The Naniwa Tradtional line is actually pretty good. They have 2 220 grit stone one is alox (pink) and the other is SiC (green). Their whole is good and I would not say they are under the super stone. They also have 2 type of 1000 grit, one is clay binder and the other vitreous. Pretty good and diverse line up.
Click to expand...

I had no idea they had 2 types in the traditional?? Can anyone explain what the pro/cons are of clay vs vitreous binders on synthetic stones?

And yeah my mistake I was saying 240 grit it is indeed 220 for the traditional.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top