Quantcast
Spine Thickness Does Matter
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Spine Thickness Does Matter

  1. #1

    Spine Thickness Does Matter

    So, while I still am trying to work out an optimal thickness for a pro environment knife (a good balance between weight and geometry thickness), I took a recommendation from one of the pro guys here who used my knives, and ground one slightly thicker what I normally grind.

    After some cutting at home, I liked the performance. It had a solid feel and I didn't see much decrease of cutting performance over thinner knives. It would make a good line knife - no flex, solid feel and thin above the edge (right now it's under .005").

    Then I ground another knife even thicker at the spine but thin at the edge, and put it through the same cutting routine - apples, carrots, potatoes and onions. I didn't cut any proteins, as the purpose of the test was for an all-around knife.

    The performance difference between the two was quite noticeable. On a thicker knife, the heel and middle of the knife wedged where on a thinner it didn't.

    Both knives were ground to the same thinness at the edge, and approximately same convex 2/3 up the blade. The difference in weight was pretty negligible (officially 8g, but the heavier knife has a shorter machi, which probably took off another 8g from overall weight).

    So, it seems to point to one conclusion - spine thickness does matter, regardless how thin a knife above the edge is. Spine thickness affects geometry in mid-section, which in turn affects cutting ability of a knife to go through denser foods like apples.

    Here as some shots of spine, heel, profile and measurements. The spine shot is a bit distorted - those are not as thick as they look, but you can see a contrast in thickness well. Also, I come to think that spine measurements on a thinner knife are similar to 260mm Mario's Carter.


    M

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0283.jpg 
Views:	91 
Size:	25.3 KB 
ID:	3214

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0285.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	27.0 KB 
ID:	3215

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0286.jpg 
Views:	112 
Size:	25.1 KB 
ID:	3216

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0290.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	25.6 KB 
ID:	3217


    "If there’s something worth doing, it’s worth overdoing.” - An US saying.

    If my KKF Inbox is full (or not), please contact me via Email: anvlts@gmail.com

  2. #2
    The spine should be as thin as possible while still achieving the weight/balance desired.

  3. #3
    Right, so it makes sense to make two different versions of the same knife. At the weight of 220g with a handle (thicker one), it will still be a pretty light knife. The thinner version will weigh about 200g or slightly less.
    What I found interesting, is that you can have a negligible weight difference, but very different performance on similarly ground knives all due to spine thickness.

    M

    PS: the thicker knife that I tested will be reground


    "If there’s something worth doing, it’s worth overdoing.” - An US saying.

    If my KKF Inbox is full (or not), please contact me via Email: anvlts@gmail.com

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    1,296
    Interesting stuff, Marko. Have you messed around with different degrees of taper yet?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    2,318
    Your dedication to r&d is phenominal. Definately commendable is the thought b ehind every aspect of your knives.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ******* View Post
    Interesting stuff, Marko. Have you messed around with different degrees of taper yet?
    I don't really measure it in degrees. I sort of grind it till it looks about right. Now that I set on a benchmark where it needs to be, I will start using calipers more often.

    @Matt - now I have no excuse to procrastinate. This was the last question I needed to get an answer and I think I got it.

    M


    "If there’s something worth doing, it’s worth overdoing.” - An US saying.

    If my KKF Inbox is full (or not), please contact me via Email: anvlts@gmail.com

  7. #7
    You have one blade going from 3.19 to 2.71 and the other 2.93 to 2.12,those grinds are not similar at all.Are you trying to compare a similar spine tapers but at different thickness,or just a thicker middle and tip spine with the same behind the edge grind.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    750
    I've just decided who I'm going to for my next knife.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by RRLOVER View Post
    You have one blade going from 3.19 to 2.71 and the other 2.93 to 2.12,those grinds are not similar at all.Are you trying to compare a similar spine tapers but at different thickness,or just a thicker middle and tip spine with the same behind the edge grind.
    That is a conclusion I arrived after (thicker spine translated into thicker middle). I have not ground a thick knife before and was wondering how claims that spine thickness doesn't matter as long as a knife ground thin above edge (unless above edge means middle, or more precise, hollowed out middle like in Shigefusa ). The degree of convexing was similar on both knives, but that didn't seem to matter as the thicker knife wedged in it's mid section.

    I already reground it and cut some vegetables with it. Definitely a difference.

    M


    "If there’s something worth doing, it’s worth overdoing.” - An US saying.

    If my KKF Inbox is full (or not), please contact me via Email: anvlts@gmail.com

  10. #10
    I see now.The middle is my bane,to thin and it's flexy to thick and it wedges.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •