Quantcast
Takamura Suminagashi vs Blazen differences
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Takamura Suminagashi vs Blazen differences

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    437

    Takamura Suminagashi vs Blazen differences

    Does anyone know if there is a difference in the hardness or quality of the hagane in the Takamura Blazen versus a Takamura Suminagashi? Are the forging processes different? Visibly, they appear to be identical except for the damascus etching. However, the Chefsarmoury.com website quotes a HRC of 63 for the Blazen and 65 for the Suminagashi.

    I own several Takamura Hana series knives (Suminagashi with octagonal handle) and they are great performers. I don't abuse them and haven't encountered chipping, so I'm just curious if there are intrinsic differences in the hagane. The Chefsarmoury.com site quotes a HRC of 62 for the Hana (octagonal). I have no idea where they got this information or whether it's accurate.

  2. #2
    Senior Member chinacats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,288
    Greetings and Welcome!
    one man gathers what another man spills...

  3. #3
    Senior Member Crothcipt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    wyoming, closer to nowhere than somewhere.
    Posts
    3,502
    no help here but Welcome.

  4. #4
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1

    takamura 240 gyuto

    http://postimage.org/image/nojwng0i1/

    http://postimage.org/image/4re7ns4tp/

    http://postimage.org/image/j30iocb45/

    this is my 240 takamura blazen i got today. first impressions of it was that it was much heavier than your regular japanese chefs knife which i like and also not flexible at all. handle feels great too! not sure how these knives would compare too other blazens and other takamura knives... let me know if anyone has ever used one of these and tell me what you think about them.

    sorry for the image quality... dunno if you guys can see but the label has the takamura logo instead of just the blazen logo which all the other blazens iv seen have
    Last edited by unkajonet; 08-03-2012 at 01:18 AM. Reason: Potentially offensive language

  5. #5
    Engorged Member
    El Pescador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,901
    Those pictures are horrible. Welcome!

  6. #6
    Senior Member NO ChoP!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Clayton, NC- surrounded by lots of trees
    Posts
    2,082
    Quote Originally Posted by El Pescador View Post
    Those pictures are horrible. Welcome!
    LOLz, really...
    1997 Kyocera prepay flip phone camera pics maybe?

    Nice Knife, though. When lasers became so popular many forgot about the Blazen. Great steel, solid fit and finish; a serious work horse!
    The difference between try and triumph is a little "umph"! NO EXCUSES!!!!!!!
    chefchristophermiller@yahoo.com

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cardiff, UK
    Posts
    794
    I've got a takamura suminigashi and it takes a great edge that I haven't found prone to chipping. Not used a Blazen to compare it to though unfortunately

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts