But at least I cannot see, from comments I read here, that anyone has managed to give any good reasons for dismissing him (yes Carter, Korin etc etc are all better, but so what?).
Carter, Korin, and Jon (et al) aren’t pretenders.
Last edited:
But at least I cannot see, from comments I read here, that anyone has managed to give any good reasons for dismissing him (yes Carter, Korin etc etc are all better, but so what?).
Best Top Gear ever was them trying to kill a Toyota pickup.
But at least I cannot see, from comments I read here, that anyone has managed to give any good reasons for dismissing him
You nailed it. He just talks forever, trying to make the best expression, but it takes ages until some actual information leaves his mouth. And even if that information is relevant or even helpful - it still feels like it is second to the whole show. I think many of us simply expect information presented in a fairly condensed manner, not a single man talkshow.
He is by nature a professional sales manager. I mean it in a positive sense of the word. He has qualities that most of us don’t. But watching his videos feels like watching moose grow in a real time.
I see what you mean about Burrfection (sum up: long videos, little - sometimes even bad - content). Still, that doesn’t quite explain the aversion (not thinking of you in particular, so do not take it personally). The level of aversion is not quite proportionate to the level of his alleged inadequacies. If he is pretty bad, well go ahead and dislike him. Just don’t claim it has anything to do with some mistakes he has done in his excessively long videos!
Is it not simply the case that many of you guys picking on Burrfection simply do not like that he does what he does - end of story? That is of course fine! But at least I cannot see, from comments I read here, that anyone has managed to give any good reasons for dismissing him (yes Carter, Korin etc etc are all better, but so what?).
That was my introduction to them...Best Top Gear ever was them trying to kill a Toyota pickup.
I think this says "a 210 mm Watanabe costs $300"For $240, i would add another $60 and get a 210mm Watanabe.
I have Kamikoto knives. Not one thing wrong with them. I have plenty of expertise, so unless you hold one and use it, no real need to disparage it. Burrfection, on the other hand is a sales jockey.
$240 for AUS-8 ... from Burrfection ... no, I would not.
Is it not simply the case that many of you guys picking on Burrfection simply do not like that he does what he does - end of story? That is of course fine! But at least I cannot see, from comments I read here, that anyone has managed to give any good reasons for dismissing him (yes Carter, Korin etc etc are all better, but so what?).
I think this says "a 210 mm Watanabe costs $300"
Yes. On the other hand, some people might have a budget of $200 and just be able to stretch that to $240. There is almost always something better for not that much more. I mean, why would I settle for the $300 Watanabe when, for just a few dollars more, I could get a TF or some such? Where does it stop?So why settle for something else that's probably worse in order to save $60?
Yes. On the other hand, some people might have a budget of $200 and just be able to stretch that to $240. There is almost always something better for not that much more. I mean, why would I settle for the $300 Watanabe when, for just a few dollars more, I could get a TF or some such? Where does it stop?
Realistically, I can get an absolutely superb knife for $200 to $300. It'll cut extremely well, hold its edge very well, have whatever profile I like, with any handle shape I desire, and be made from pretty much any steel I want.
Go above $300, and we are moving into the realm of collectibles, rarity, and vanity. I do own some knives that cost more than that, so I'm guilty as charged. Those knives are prettier, rarer, have special wood for the handle, whatever. But, in my experience, they don't noticeably work better than a knife for $300.
Over $300, the law of diminishing returns kicks in with full force…
Try cars… Being addicted to knives is dirt-cheap in comparison!This sort of applies to a lot of hobbies. I feel like $300 is a magic diminishing returns number for usability to luxury.
Try cars… Being addicted to knives is dirt-cheap in comparison!
Go above $300, and we are moving into the realm of collectibles, rarity, and vanity. I do own some knives that cost more than that, so I'm guilty as charged.
These were recommended to me by the exec chef of Bacchanalia in Atlanta. I bought a couple of kits and found them to be great knives. They hold an edge just fine and are a slightly softer steel, so easy to re-edge. As far as their marketing ploy, they try to hype the fact there is no middleman so they can use some inflated numbers to draw in buyers. This tactic puts people off. So, without even trying a knife, they get all commers deciding that 420J2 steel is ****, so therefore these are mass produced Chinese drivel. I certainly know the difference between these knives and a boutique knife. They are worth what I paid for them and I'm happy to recommend themThis is what i find most interesting about this thread. Someone with kamikoto knives. Tell me more about these and perhaps put some context into their prices and what you think about them.
Yes. On the other hand, some people might have a budget of $200 and just be able to stretch that to $240. There is almost always something better for not that much more. I mean, why would I settle for the $300 Watanabe when, for just a few dollars more, I could get a TF or some such? Where does it stop?
Enter your email address to join: