To me, this a variation on the question, "which is the best knife", which is often asked by people new to knives. I guess it follows in some ways from the desire to know what you get for your money as the price goes up.
There is, of course, no "best knife". Different knives excel at different things. Indeed some knives don't excel at much at all. This is the true beauty of kitchen knives- there are so many facets of performance, ergonomics and aesthetics to take into account and you will only start to learn about these as you try differnt knives. What one person considers important will vary from another person and indeed will likely change from one situation to another.
Many of the facets of performance are trade-offs with another facet, so the knifemaker needs to choose which aspect they are pursuing. For example, a thin knife will excel at going through hard produce but sucks (literally) at going through wet produce. A thick knife can incorporate grind features such as convexity which allow easy passage through wet produce but can wedge in hard produce. Note that if you give a thick knife a flat grind it will also get a lot of stiction in wet produce, so it important for the knifemaker to actually do the work to get the benefit out of a thick grind.
So, no, for me there is no "grail" knife (we often call them "unicorns" on KKF). I appreciate each knife for what it does well. And what it doesn't, because this informs my understanding of why it doesn't do it well and what is required in a knife to perform that particular task well.
There is, of course, no "best knife". Different knives excel at different things. Indeed some knives don't excel at much at all. This is the true beauty of kitchen knives- there are so many facets of performance, ergonomics and aesthetics to take into account and you will only start to learn about these as you try differnt knives. What one person considers important will vary from another person and indeed will likely change from one situation to another.
Many of the facets of performance are trade-offs with another facet, so the knifemaker needs to choose which aspect they are pursuing. For example, a thin knife will excel at going through hard produce but sucks (literally) at going through wet produce. A thick knife can incorporate grind features such as convexity which allow easy passage through wet produce but can wedge in hard produce. Note that if you give a thick knife a flat grind it will also get a lot of stiction in wet produce, so it important for the knifemaker to actually do the work to get the benefit out of a thick grind.
So, no, for me there is no "grail" knife (we often call them "unicorns" on KKF). I appreciate each knife for what it does well. And what it doesn't, because this informs my understanding of why it doesn't do it well and what is required in a knife to perform that particular task well.
Last edited: