SolidSnake03
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2014
- Messages
- 1,796
- Reaction score
- 1,741
Hey All,
Time for my review! First of all I want to thank Raquin and everyone that's a part of this pass around, it's been a lovely experience so far and glad to be a part of it. As a bit of a preface, I've used couple of Raquins knives before, a classic grind or his earlier grind style and then most recently a KT or Kitchen Tractor style grind, I greatly enjoyed both and this nakiri was no different. Overall it was a lovely knife and I'm glad to get to try it.
Getting to more details and specifics now some real simple likes and dislikes....which are few compared to the likes
Likes
-Handle, the right size, right thickness, excellent grip and hand feel, honestly it puts a lot of custom handles I've used to shame in its overall utility. Never once felt slippery or like it wasn't substantial enough in hand. It's the anti-Takamura handle if you know what I mean. In a way it reminded me of older Sabatier Nogeant style handles, not in shape but in the look simple but are perfect for your hand and grip sort of way. It's unassuming but excellent. Okay probably enough about the handle...onto the next point
-KU finish, this is one of the better KU finishes I've used and this carries over like the handle from all the other Raquin knives I've tried. It's not too grippy or sticky and doesn't have that fake "gun blue" color or slipperiness that some cheaper Japanese knives have on their KU. Overall it's a great balance and looks nice as well as being functional
-Profile and grind overall, it's got enough heft to make it a great nakiri that just falls through softer stuff. It does struggle a bit through some tougher/harder stuff as others have mentioned but it's by no means bad. The wide bevels are nicely finished and flattened and the edge has a bit of curve to it so you aren't slamming into the board with every cut. Basically it's good a great overall profile and grind is great but not exceptional (more on this later in the closing notes)
-Steel is something I'm going to list in both the likes and dislikes along with grind, I love how easy the steel is to sharpen, touch up on naturals and the kind of edge it takes. Very clean edge and extremely sharp with little effort. Overall the marks of a good steel. A bit on the reactive side compared to some other carbon steel but not crazy bad, it's not Misono Swedish Steel or Masakage Shimo bad in terms of reactivity. Those things are aggressively reactive and corrosive to the point that you might as well toss your first pound or two of onions if you just thinned them because they will ruin those onions. I do wish the steel was a bit better in edge retention though and this is the one area that I think it's held back a little bit (along with a little bit of the grind) from being truly top tier/number 1 for me.
Dislikes
-Grind although really the grind is great overall. It's a like for me in that it falls through softer food and has nicely done wide bevels yet ultimately in some ways like with harder and tougher stuff the grind holds it back a little bit. Similar to my thoughts on the KT Raquin, it's great for most things but struggles on a few. This holds it back from being in my top nakiri's ever. That spot is still firmly held by Toyama and Watanabe. I would put the Raquin in the top 5 for sure but it's not top 3...I would put Kochi potentially in that top 3 as well as an old grind Takeda aka a good grind Takeda aka non-hatchet thick Takeda aka a fixed new Takeda. The grind just isn't quite as all around excellent for everything as those are. Again we are talking really really good here and it still deserves a spot in the top 5 but it's not a top 3 so to speak. I like to think of those Raquin grind as kind of like a Heiji that you eased the shoulders a bit and that was a bit more well rounded overall. Not as well rounded as the Top 3 stuff I mentioned but better than a stock Heiji while having some similar aspects to the grind style.
-Steel is a tricky one for me because there is so much to like about the steel from how easily it sharpens to how the edges feel. My only complaint with it comes from edge retention, it isn't as good as I would like. Nakiri tend to make a good bit of board contact in use and the edge retention is noticeable less than Toyama/Watanabe and Takeda. Yeah it's a bit easier to sharpen but I would say that the gulf in edge retention is much bigger than the gulf in sharpening ease if that makes sense? Again I do really like the steel overall it would just be nice to have a bit better edge retention even in comparison to some of the Japanese steels.
-Availability, seriously I wish his stuff was easier to get. Getting a Raquin is not easy and that sucks because his work is so good. I mean I'm happy he is so popular and clearly doing well but on a selfish note it's harder to get than I would like
-Overall I know I'm being picky in this dislikes section but I felt it worthwhile to outline everything here best I could.
Closing Thoughts
Overall this knife is great, really nice piece and worth the asking price. It falls just short of the very best nakiri's that I've used but it's still in excellent company. Could this be a one and done nakiri for someone? Definitely! It's shortcomings are not so much that you would want another nakiri and I'm mostly splitting hairs in my comparisons. It's a great knife and to be honest it only loses out to a few of the very best nakiri's I've tried over the last 10+ years of my knife hobby/obsession.
Time for my review! First of all I want to thank Raquin and everyone that's a part of this pass around, it's been a lovely experience so far and glad to be a part of it. As a bit of a preface, I've used couple of Raquins knives before, a classic grind or his earlier grind style and then most recently a KT or Kitchen Tractor style grind, I greatly enjoyed both and this nakiri was no different. Overall it was a lovely knife and I'm glad to get to try it.
Getting to more details and specifics now some real simple likes and dislikes....which are few compared to the likes
Likes
-Handle, the right size, right thickness, excellent grip and hand feel, honestly it puts a lot of custom handles I've used to shame in its overall utility. Never once felt slippery or like it wasn't substantial enough in hand. It's the anti-Takamura handle if you know what I mean. In a way it reminded me of older Sabatier Nogeant style handles, not in shape but in the look simple but are perfect for your hand and grip sort of way. It's unassuming but excellent. Okay probably enough about the handle...onto the next point
-KU finish, this is one of the better KU finishes I've used and this carries over like the handle from all the other Raquin knives I've tried. It's not too grippy or sticky and doesn't have that fake "gun blue" color or slipperiness that some cheaper Japanese knives have on their KU. Overall it's a great balance and looks nice as well as being functional
-Profile and grind overall, it's got enough heft to make it a great nakiri that just falls through softer stuff. It does struggle a bit through some tougher/harder stuff as others have mentioned but it's by no means bad. The wide bevels are nicely finished and flattened and the edge has a bit of curve to it so you aren't slamming into the board with every cut. Basically it's good a great overall profile and grind is great but not exceptional (more on this later in the closing notes)
-Steel is something I'm going to list in both the likes and dislikes along with grind, I love how easy the steel is to sharpen, touch up on naturals and the kind of edge it takes. Very clean edge and extremely sharp with little effort. Overall the marks of a good steel. A bit on the reactive side compared to some other carbon steel but not crazy bad, it's not Misono Swedish Steel or Masakage Shimo bad in terms of reactivity. Those things are aggressively reactive and corrosive to the point that you might as well toss your first pound or two of onions if you just thinned them because they will ruin those onions. I do wish the steel was a bit better in edge retention though and this is the one area that I think it's held back a little bit (along with a little bit of the grind) from being truly top tier/number 1 for me.
Dislikes
-Grind although really the grind is great overall. It's a like for me in that it falls through softer food and has nicely done wide bevels yet ultimately in some ways like with harder and tougher stuff the grind holds it back a little bit. Similar to my thoughts on the KT Raquin, it's great for most things but struggles on a few. This holds it back from being in my top nakiri's ever. That spot is still firmly held by Toyama and Watanabe. I would put the Raquin in the top 5 for sure but it's not top 3...I would put Kochi potentially in that top 3 as well as an old grind Takeda aka a good grind Takeda aka non-hatchet thick Takeda aka a fixed new Takeda. The grind just isn't quite as all around excellent for everything as those are. Again we are talking really really good here and it still deserves a spot in the top 5 but it's not a top 3 so to speak. I like to think of those Raquin grind as kind of like a Heiji that you eased the shoulders a bit and that was a bit more well rounded overall. Not as well rounded as the Top 3 stuff I mentioned but better than a stock Heiji while having some similar aspects to the grind style.
-Steel is a tricky one for me because there is so much to like about the steel from how easily it sharpens to how the edges feel. My only complaint with it comes from edge retention, it isn't as good as I would like. Nakiri tend to make a good bit of board contact in use and the edge retention is noticeable less than Toyama/Watanabe and Takeda. Yeah it's a bit easier to sharpen but I would say that the gulf in edge retention is much bigger than the gulf in sharpening ease if that makes sense? Again I do really like the steel overall it would just be nice to have a bit better edge retention even in comparison to some of the Japanese steels.
-Availability, seriously I wish his stuff was easier to get. Getting a Raquin is not easy and that sucks because his work is so good. I mean I'm happy he is so popular and clearly doing well but on a selfish note it's harder to get than I would like
-Overall I know I'm being picky in this dislikes section but I felt it worthwhile to outline everything here best I could.
Closing Thoughts
Overall this knife is great, really nice piece and worth the asking price. It falls just short of the very best nakiri's that I've used but it's still in excellent company. Could this be a one and done nakiri for someone? Definitely! It's shortcomings are not so much that you would want another nakiri and I'm mostly splitting hairs in my comparisons. It's a great knife and to be honest it only loses out to a few of the very best nakiri's I've tried over the last 10+ years of my knife hobby/obsession.