Tennis!

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I like seeing Stefanos Tsitsipas lose as much as the next person, and I also quite like Nick Kyrgios. But that match yesterday was a f-ing joke.

And there's almost nobody left in the men's draw. The Djokovic v Alcaraz/Sinner QF game basically looks like the final now.

I thought the fourth set yesterday in Tsitsipas/Kyrgios was pretty good tennis, but all the extraneous crap was (as always) ridiculous. I actually can't stand either player tbh. Kyrgios is a self-absorbed drama queen and Tsitsipas is a pretentious ******. Not a good look for either of them.

That said, really excited for Alcaraz/Sinner to get underway 🎾
 
Kyrgios is a self-absorbed drama queen and Tsitsipas is a pretentious ******. Not a good look for either of them.


Ha! Yes, I think that's a pretty spot-on assessment.

---

Can't say I was all that surprised by the Sinner v Alcaraz result. The former hadn't really been on my radar until this year, but the handful of his games I've watched since then have been seriously impressive. I think he pushes Djokovic very hard later today, and whoever comes through has got to be favourite to win. Should be an excellent match!
 
Ah... I didn't think Jannick Sinner sounded or looked particularly Italian, and google tells me he's from Sudtirol.

So basically he's really German/Austrian.
 
Go Jannick! What a first set.

Ich bin ein Sudtiroler!!!
 
Go Jannick! What a first set.

Ich bin ein Sudtiroler!!!

I couldn't watch the match because ESPN+ apparently stops covering the second week and it's back on ESPN 🤬

But yeah Sinner is obviously a youngster to watch. Such a pure ball striker. Lot of power for that skinny frame.

I was pretty dejected about the end of the Federer era but there are certainly some rising stars to root for.
 

muppetwikia.jpg
 
Nadaaaaaaaaaaaal 😭

Kyrgios is getting a walk-through... 😒


Very sad indeed, though unsurprising I think. I was amazed he continued playing that 1/4 final, it was one of the more staggering tennis matches I've ever seen.

Looking on the bright side though, better news from the UK - Boris Johnson got forced out! One of the most venal and unpleasant people I've had the misfortune of working with.

(That doesn't count as a political comment btw, because Johnson was a politician in only the very loosest sense of the word. I can think of few people more laughably ill-equipped for the task of governance.)
 
Last edited:
Alright. My curiosity is piqued. In what capacity did you work with the now ex PM?


Haha! Err... I fell in with a bad crowd after university and ended up getting a job in politics by mistake. We didn't work very closely with the Mayor's Office tbh, but we'd do some campaign stuff together. Funnily enough the guy I was working for at the time (Shaun Bailey) went on to be the Conservative candidate in last year's London Mayoral Elections.

I spent longer working for a different MP in the commons. It wasn't too bad; he was one of the few decent ones, and didn't seem to mind that nobody working for him had any Conservative political views, as long as stuff got done. I think officially I was meant to be a member of the party, but he probably knew better than to ask too many questions.
 
Haha! Err... I fell in with a bad crowd after university and ended up getting a job in politics by mistake. We didn't work very closely with the Mayor's Office tbh, but we'd do some campaign stuff together. Funnily enough the guy I was working for at the time (Shaun Bailey) went on to be the Conservative candidate in last year's London Mayoral Elections.

I spent longer working for a different MP in the commons. It wasn't too bad; he was one of the few decent ones, and didn't seem to mind that nobody working for him had any Conservative political views, as long as stuff got done. I think officially I was meant to be a member of the party, but he probably knew better than to ask too many questions.

signal-2022-07-08-22-31-53-865.jpg
 
So... Djokovic vs Kyrgios, and unfortunately there can only be one loser. Who are people begrudgingly rooting for later today...?

TBH on occasion I don't mind Nick Kyrgios, though he doesn't do much to help. I like his approach to entertainment, the genuinely don't-give-a-f*** attitude, and the raw talent is very evident. Being optimistic - one might think that perhaps winning a major might even make him less of a ****.

Whichever way, it will most certainly be a good match. If Nadal had got through to the final I think it would be a more one-sided affair, and I would have been very sad at the end. But Kyrgios, perhaps along with Berrettini, are probably the only two players currently on the tour with a legitimate chance of beating Djokovic in a Wimbledon final.

So I'm gonna call two results... either Djokovic in 5. Or Kyrgios blows him off the court, and wins in 3.
 
Last edited:
So I'm gonna call two results... either Djokovic in 5. Or Kyrgios blows him off the court, and wins in 3.

Wow! I like that call...

I have no emotional investment in either of them as players/personalities... so I hope it it just a good final? If I had to make a begrudging call.... I suppose I will be rooting for Kyrgios? That said... if he gets up to his twatish antics... I could easily swing to Djokovic.
 
Wow! I like that call...

I have no emotional investment in either of them as players/personalities... so I hope it it just a good final? If I had to make a begrudging call.... I suppose I will be rooting for Kyrgios? That said... if he gets up to his twatish antics... I could easily swing to Djokovic.


Obviously Djokovic is gonna be a heavy a favourite, but not beyond the realms of possibility Krygios winning in 3 I don't think... Djokovic's last 5 grand slam finals he's won three (vs Medvedev, Tsitipas and Berrettini), lost two (Nadal and Medvedev), both of those in straight sets.

The big problem for ND, which we might be about to see in this first set, is that if he gets broken and Kyrgios' first serve is firing, then the set can be over in ten minutes before there's any time to regroup.
 
Screen Shot 2022-07-15 at 9.07.55 AM.png


Speaking of tennis, whenever I see this KKF ad out of the corner of my eye, I think it shows a woman following through on her sick one handed backhand.
 
Well here we are in Paris once again, but with a twist... all pundits and journalists are now contractually obliged to describe the draw as 'blown wide open', by the absence for the first time in 18 years of Rafael Nadal. Which of course is true. We saw last year that if Rafa goes to Roland Garros then Rafa wins Roland Garros, even if he can't walk, and the same would've been the case this year too. What it also means is that Novak Djokovic is now pretty much a racing certainty to finish with the most Slams, but will he take the lead by next Sunday?

Probably not. There are a handful of players on the tour that you would now fancy to beat NJ on clay at Masters level, all of whom are still in the draw; Ruud, Rune, maybe Tsitsipas, and certainly Alacaraz.

On paper, and balance of talent, the tournament looks like Alcaraz's to lose. Though Holger Rune might have something to say about that, because Alcaraz's game isn't necessarily suited to clay to the extent that some people make out. He doesn't have the type of weaponry that makes Rafa effectively unplayable in Paris; he hits the ball harder and flatter, without the follow through and brutal topspin that Nadal generates. His game is more like a combination of Federer's and Djokovic's, than it is Nadal's.

But there's a massive elephant in the room if we're trying to argue for a first-time champion at Roland Garros this year. And that's because this isn't a Masters level competition, it's a Grand Slam, and it's five sets. Fed-Nad-Djok were the best players of their generation, probably of all time, but they were on occasion beaten in a best of three by others. They were almost never beaten in five. At some point in a five set game NJ will hit a level that his opponent simply cannot keep up with, and whether they can ride that storm without crumbling mentally will determine whether anyone can beat him Paris this coming week.

Nevertheless I would put Alcaraz/Tsitsipas as marginal favourites in the semi against Djokovic, but if they fail to stop him then he should have the edge on Ruud, evens on Rune.

What does the rest of the KKF Tennis community (i.e. @ian) reckon...?
 
Last edited:
And to make a little kooky, outside-bet prediction: I think Stef Tsitsipas could win it. **** though he is.
 
As I sit here with the French Open playing on my tv, my thoughts on tennis are: 1) that they should really show more doubles on television during Grand Slams, and 2) that singles is really good 10% of the time and quite boring the remaining 90% (that ratio does at least put it above cricket, baseball, and golf). I imagine watching it in-person makes it much more enjoyable though.

I'm coming around more and more to the notion that padel is the most entertaining form of racket sport, although I could do without the Middle Eastern sports washing that inevitably gets thrown in with its professional circuits.
 
Well here we are in Paris once again, but with a twist... all pundits and journalists are now contractually obliged to describe the draw as 'blown wide open' by the absence for the first time in 18 years of Rafael Nadal. Which of course is true. We saw last year that if Rafa goes to Roland Garros then Rafa wins Roland Garros, even if he can't walk, and the same would've been the case this year too. What it also means is that Novak Djokovic is now pretty much a racing certainty to finish with the most Slams, but will he take the lead by next Sunday?

Probably not. There are a handful of players on the tour that you would now fancy to beat NJ on clay at Masters level, all of whom are still in the draw; Ruud, Rune, maybe Tsitsipas, and certainly Alacaraz.

On paper, and balance of talent, the tournament looks like Alcaraz's to lose, though Holger Rune might have something to say about that, because Alcaraz's game isn't necessarily suited to clay to the extent that some people make out. He doesn't have the type of weaponry that makes Rafa effectively unplayable in Paris; he hits the ball harder and flatter, without the brutal follow through and topspin that Nadal generates. His game is more like a combination of Federer's and Djokovic's, than it is Nadal's.

But there's a massive elephant in the room if we're trying to argue for a first-time champion at Roland Garros this year. And that's because this isn't a Masters level competition, it's a Grand Slam, and it's five sets. Fed-Nad-Djok were the best players of their generation, probably of all time, but they were on occasion beaten in a best of three by others. They were almost never beaten in five. At some point in a five set game NJ will hit a level that his opponent simply cannot keep up with, and whether they can ride that storm without crumbling mentally will determine whether anyone can beat him Paris this coming week.

Nevertheless I would put Alcaraz/Tsitsipas as marginal favourites in the semi against Djokovic, but if they fail to stop him then he should have the edge on Ruud, evens on Rune.

What does the rest of the KKF Tennis community (i.e. @ian) reckon...?

Lifelong player and fan here. I agree with pretty much everything you wrote, except that I think I'm going to give the edge to Alcaraz. He just doesn't seem to be affected by the pressure of a major, by the rigors of a 5 setter. He seems made in a lab for this. With every passing moment, his star is rising and Djokovic's is falling. If this isn't the time, then it will come very soon.

I don't put Ruud and Rune in the same book. Rune is a head case who needs to grow up. Ruud is very talented but I think he just lacks that killer instinct.

Tsitsipas is just displeasing by like every possible metric 😆

More than anything, I was sad to see Sinner exiting so early. I think the future belongs to Alcaraz and Sinner, along with Rune if he can get his mental/emotional sh*t together. I think Shelton also has tremendous potential.

Anyway, with Rafa out, it's just not the same. Hope he can put one last magical run together next year.
 
Who is the player that has won the FO the most times that is competing at this years FO?

Which player has defeated Nadal the most times at the FO?

That person is the actual favorite to win ☝🏻
 
Who is the player that has won the FO the most times that is competing at this years FO?

Which player has defeated Nadal the most times at the FO?

That person is the actual favorite to win ☝🏻

FWIW that player already lost to Alcaraz on clay in Madrid 2022 and that was a year ago, practically a lifetime for the youngster in terms of development.
 
Back
Top