Let me preface this by saying that I have zero experience with honyaki blades so feel free to school me accordingly.
First, the context: My understanding of honyaki has always been that it means that the blade is differentially tempered/hardened. Softer at the spine, harder at the edge. The hamon that you see on honyaki knives is a result of the differential tempering.
However, I have also seen some makers use the "honyaki" label to (apparently?) just mean monosteel. For example, the suisin inox honyaki is not a "honyaki" knife in the true sense of the word, no? I think they are just using honyaki to mean that the knife is not san mai.
Second, the question: I have recently come across a monosteel carbon blade (shirogami 1) that is described as "honyaki." The knife has no visible hamon that I can perceive. When I asked the retailer if the knife was "honyaki" in the sense that it was differentially hardened, or just as shorthand for monosteel, I received the following response: "This knife is oil-quenching. Full-steel quenching is categorized into water-quenching and oil-quenching. Water-quenching knives are very sharp but lack toughness compared to oil-quenching ones. A full-steel oil-quenching knife strikes a great balance between flexibility and toughness while maintaining a high level of sharpness!"
Help me decipher that response. What does it indicate as far as whether this knife is "real" honyaki as opposed to how the term is used in the context of the suisin inox honyaki? The dude says it's oil quenched, so, it is abura honyaki (as opposed to mizu honyaki)? Does lack of visible hamon mean that there is something less "legit" about the honyaki-ness of this knife? Or is hamon not a necessary aspect of honyaki? Alternatively, could it have a hamon and just not be visible because of the way that the knife is finished?
First, the context: My understanding of honyaki has always been that it means that the blade is differentially tempered/hardened. Softer at the spine, harder at the edge. The hamon that you see on honyaki knives is a result of the differential tempering.
However, I have also seen some makers use the "honyaki" label to (apparently?) just mean monosteel. For example, the suisin inox honyaki is not a "honyaki" knife in the true sense of the word, no? I think they are just using honyaki to mean that the knife is not san mai.
Second, the question: I have recently come across a monosteel carbon blade (shirogami 1) that is described as "honyaki." The knife has no visible hamon that I can perceive. When I asked the retailer if the knife was "honyaki" in the sense that it was differentially hardened, or just as shorthand for monosteel, I received the following response: "This knife is oil-quenching. Full-steel quenching is categorized into water-quenching and oil-quenching. Water-quenching knives are very sharp but lack toughness compared to oil-quenching ones. A full-steel oil-quenching knife strikes a great balance between flexibility and toughness while maintaining a high level of sharpness!"
Help me decipher that response. What does it indicate as far as whether this knife is "real" honyaki as opposed to how the term is used in the context of the suisin inox honyaki? The dude says it's oil quenched, so, it is abura honyaki (as opposed to mizu honyaki)? Does lack of visible hamon mean that there is something less "legit" about the honyaki-ness of this knife? Or is hamon not a necessary aspect of honyaki? Alternatively, could it have a hamon and just not be visible because of the way that the knife is finished?