Well... yes and no... the drug in a cigarette is tobacco... and tobacco isn't the **** that is actually killing us, smokers, in those f***ing cigarettes! It's like the least dangerous substance in there.
Been a long time since "Copperhead road".
I really miss Stevie Ray.
Same here. I know I've got an addictive personality (as my forum use may or may not demonstrate...) so I totally avoid things that I could easily wind up using destructive amounts of.My take? Simple: I don’t take it.
Alcohol is and always will be the most dangerous sh!t AND commercially available; it has killed, and will continue to kill, way more people that all other drugs combined.
England pushing opium on China was the worst.
I didn't realise Hawaii had the same problems with shipping that we have down hereJust ordered used paperback of Tai Pan off Amazon 2.98 + 299 shipping
Nobel House sounds similar to Tai pan Nobel House based in Hong Kong with Jardine. Maybe you have already read it.
Full legalization is a complex issue and I don't support it completely across the board for all substances. For marijuana, yes, definitely legalization on a federal level for everyone over the age of 21. I think there are a lot of therapeutic benefits found in trained staff working with MDMA, LSD, and psilocybin and our whole system of "Schedule 1" drugs needs a complete overhaul. MAPS is doing a lot of great work with MDMA and PTSD and hopefully it will be rescheduled in the near future.
Big Pharma is the real enemy in my eyes and they have made billions off getting people addicted to opiates, amphetamines and benzos - which are all very destructive substances that have ruined many lives and communities.
Yeah, anyone who has ever heard of the US should know about this, it's no secret. The entire idea was to get people hooked in order to have a consistent sales model.Ahem, Purdue Pharma and the Sackler's. Loom them up if you haven't heard about it.
And if you wanted off, they conveniently have a drug for that.Yeah, anyone who has ever heard of the US should know about this, it's no secret. The entire idea was to get people hooked in order to have a consistent sales model.
Maybe it's coincidence? Or maybe it's covering all your sales bases.And if you wanted off, they conveniently have a drug for that.
I wasn't denying the grey and black market stuff.yeahyeah, Purdue, in the end pharma companies like all others make money, and marketing groups easily go haywire real quick BUT regulatory oversight is in place (and often fails). In the end of the day the biggest issues are not with prescribed drug users but with illegal non prescibed 'recreational' use. Pharmacists selling drugs under the counter, presciption owners selling drug on to others...
true, and that is what you expect. 'We at company X promote the use of our product'; public companies need to make profits for investors that make doing cheesy things real nice real quick.Just pointing out some Pharma companies have been found guilty of being drug pushers.
Enter your email address to join: