Majime lost my business for life

Japanese Knives - by Tokushu Knife
Shop Knives and stones on ebay
Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Matt Jacobs

Matt Jacobs

KKF Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2020
Messages
998
Reaction score
2,336
Location
Washington
Just an FYI is anyone is interested. Majime knives has reached out and threatened legal action to at least 3 other knife makers via Instagram. I don't want to name them and make it worse but they are being fairly public about it. He is essentially saying that using a machine to mill out an S-grind, C-grind etc is exclusive to only him. The people he is calling out not only have different looking grinds but they have also been doing it longer. I can't believe someone in the the knife community would claim that an entire technique is theirs alone. It would be one thing if it was a copy but these aren't. I would be fine if he asked people not to copy his feather grind pattern but this is not what these other makers are doing.
 
If others have done it before and this can be proven he won't have a legal leg to stand on.
 
Sounds more like a personal thing with other smiths rather than claiming the technique as his invention.
 
Haven't heard of this maker, but cursory google search shows that his feather grind is some ugly ish. Am I supposed to grate ginger on it or something? Maybe Chelsea Miller should have her lawyers go after him.
 
Here we go. Just like Lin of Cold Steel tried to send out cease and desist letters to many of us for making and using the term "San Mai".

Its ******** and I am sad Majime decided to do that.

I've met him once when he stopped by my table at Bladeshow 2019 and recommended that I raise my prices at the time. I think he had 10k followers on IG back then.
 
Last edited:
DanielC said:
Here we go. Just like Lin of Cold Steel tried to send out cease and desist letters to many of us for making and using the term "San Mai".

Its ******** and I am sad Majime decided to do that.

I've met him once when he stopped by my table at Bladeshow and recommended that I raise my prices at the time. I think he had 10k followers on IG back then.
Click to expand...

There is no one in the knife industry like Lynn Thompson! :rolleyes: The "san mai" thing was something indeed. He is his own biggest fan.

My time spent as a voyeur on the fringes of the custom knife world, it is readily apparent that makers tend to be tight knit and generous. Those that fall outside of that generally gain an appropriate reputation.

I can't imagine isolating myself from other makers, especially on some make-believe legal BS.
 
HumbleHomeCook said:
There is no one in the knife industry like Lynn Thompson! :rolleyes: The "san mai" thing was something indeed. He is his own biggest fan.

My time spent as a voyeur on the fringes of the custom knife world, it is readily apparent that makers tend to be tight knit and generous. Those that fall outside of that generally gain an appropriate reputation.

I can't imagine isolating myself from other makers, especially on some make-believe legal BS.
Click to expand...

Me neither. He's a totally nice guy. A soft spoken gentleman. He might have a lawyer retained and they are perhaps recommending this. Idk.

His social media presence is massive now though. Like way beyond most other makers. It helps with his clientele. He likely has room to piss people off and go about his business.
 
WPerry said:
Haven't heard of this maker, but cursory google search shows that his feather grind is some ugly ish. Am I supposed to grate ginger on it or something? Maybe Chelsea Miller should have her lawyers go after him.
Click to expand...

I bought one out of curiousity. The food release is impressive but the actual edge grind was pretty terrible - I’ve done quite a bit of thinning work on it.

I’m so conflicted now - I’ve been planning to buy one of his regular knives for ages but now I don’t know if I can support him after this.
 
DanielC said:
Me neither. He's a totally nice guy. A soft spoken gentleman. He might have a lawyer retained and they are perhaps recommending this. Idk.

His social media presence is massive now though. Like way beyond most other makers. It helps with his clientele. He likely has room to piss people off and go about his business.
Click to expand...

If he does have a patent or trademark/copyright, I believe legally you’re required to proactively protect it if you want to keep it. That’s why you see big global brands go after little guys for infringement all the time - if they don’t protect it then they lose it. I forget what specifically this applies to though: patent, copyright, or trademark since they’re each distinct.
 
Delat said:
If he does have a patent or trademark/copyright, I believe legally you’re required to proactively protect it if you want to keep it. That’s why you see big global brands go after little guys for infringement all the time - if they don’t protect it then they lose it. I forget what specifically this applies to though: patent, copyright, or trademark since they’re each distinct.
Click to expand...

Trademark, primarily, if my memory serves me right. Like "That generic 4x4 is not a Jeep".
 
Delat said:
If he does have a patent or trademark/copyright, I believe legally you’re required to proactively protect it if you want to keep it. That’s why you see big global brands go after little guys for infringement all the time - if they don’t protect it then they lose it. I forget what specifically this applies to though: patent, copyright, or trademark since they’re each distinct.
Click to expand...

Ah. Well that means he had the audacity to patent an s-grind 😆 which is silly. I won't bang on a guy for being silly. I would if he were being silly and sent me a cease and desist letter though.
 
LOL

majime.jpg
 
Is it even possible to patent the shape(either profile or grind) of the knife?Unless it’s specific copyright patterns right?

What if you patent the convex grind, so that basically means no body in the world can sell convex grind knives except him? Why ruin the fun for everyone.
 
Jason183 said:
Is it even possible to patent the shape(either profile or grind) of the knife?Unless it’s specific copyright patterns right?

What if you patent the convex grind, so that basically means no body in the world can sell convex grind knives except him? Why ruin the fun for everyone.
Click to expand...

Again, I am not a lawyer and I don't play one on the internet.. but in my understanding...

For regular patents, they usually refer to a "method" or an "apparatus", meaning that it should be the way to produce the grind that is patented, or possibly that a knife with his specific grind is an "apparatus" of some sort.

There is also something called a "design patent" in America, which covers more how things appear. (Similar protections also exist in other parts of the world, sometimes under differet names)

But also note that patents are normally national, meaning that an American patent does not automatically apply in e.g. Germany - you have to apply separately for these patents. And it is gererally considered that the US patent office plays partly by different rules ("first to invent" rather than "first to file") and that the USPTO is more sloppy while the rest of the world is more strict. In the rest of the world the requirements to getting a patent are usually high in e.g. not patenting something that is already in use. In the US, it is said to be easier to get a patent in such cases and then the parties have to fight it out in court. And you Americans with your litigations and settlements thereby open the can of worms for "patent trolls", persons who file or buy dubious generic-sounding patents and then make a living by suing people and corporations and living off setttlements that they shouldn't have gotten in the first place..

But it doesn't say patent, it says "legally protected milling to create food release". Again, assuming Majime is American, and assuming they actually have some protection, the protection might not be valid for a German knifemaker.

One fun read was a few years back in a similar case when a cable manufacturer got a patent-related cease-and-desist-letter:

https://www.audioholics.com/news/blue-jeans-strikes-backhttps://www.bluejeanscable.com/legal/mcp/
Edit to add: Look below at info from @HumbleHomeCook that explaines things where I was simply wrong...
 
Last edited:
gaijin said:
Again, I am not a lawyer and I don't play one on the internet.. but in my understanding...

For regular patents, they usually refer to a "method" or an "apparatus", meaning that it should be the way to produce the grind that is patented, or possibly that a knife with his specific grind is an "apparatus" of some sort.

There is also something called a "design patent" in America, which covers more how things appear. (Similar protections also exist in other parts of the world, sometimes under differet names)

But also note that patents are normally national, meaning that an American patent does not automatically apply in e.g. Germany - you have to apply separately for these patents. And it is gererally considered that the US patent office plays partly by different rules ("first to invent" rather than "first to file") and that the USPTO is more sloppy while the rest of the world is more strict. In the rest of the world the requirements to getting a patent are usually high in e.g. not patenting something that is already in use. In the US, it is said to be easier to get a patent in such cases and then the parties have to fight it out in court. And you Americans with your litigations and settlements thereby open the can of worms for "patent trolls", persons who file or buy dubious generic-sounding patents and then make a living by suing people and corporations and living off setttlements that they shouldn't have gotten in the first place..

But it doesn't say patent, it says "legally protected milling to create food release". Again, assuming Majime is American, and assuming they actually have some protection, the protection might not be valid for a German knifemaker.

One fun read was a few years back in a similar case when a cable manufacturer got a patent-related cease-and-desist-letter:

https://www.audioholics.com/news/blue-jeans-strikes-backhttps://www.bluejeanscable.com/legal/mcp/
Click to expand...

I'm not a patent attorney either.

US Patents went to first to file quite some time ago. In my experience in being a patent recipient and filer, the US Patent Office is every bit as thorough and critical as any other authority.

Patents are only enforceable where the item is sold.

Genuine litigation to protect IP is perfectly legitimate.
 
The sad thing about patents is that not infrequently the company with deeper pockets can bleed the smaller guy to death in litigation even if the smaller company's patent is basically solid.

Majime has some interesting knives/approaches but even prior to this fracas I was a little wary based on how marketing driven Majime appeared to be. I guess this confirms my less than positive reaction.
 
Last edited:
gaijin said:
Again, I am not a lawyer and I don't play one on the internet.. but in my understanding...

For regular patents, they usually refer to a "method" or an "apparatus", meaning that it should be the way to produce the grind that is patented, or possibly that a knife with his specific grind is an "apparatus" of some sort.

There is also something called a "design patent" in America, which covers more how things appear. (Similar protections also exist in other parts of the world, sometimes under differet names)

But also note that patents are normally national, meaning that an American patent does not automatically apply in e.g. Germany - you have to apply separately for these patents. And it is gererally considered that the US patent office plays partly by different rules ("first to invent" rather than "first to file") and that the USPTO is more sloppy while the rest of the world is more strict. In the rest of the world the requirements to getting a patent are usually high in e.g. not patenting something that is already in use. In the US, it is said to be easier to get a patent in such cases and then the parties have to fight it out in court. And you Americans with your litigations and settlements thereby open the can of worms for "patent trolls", persons who file or buy dubious generic-sounding patents and then make a living by suing people and corporations and living off setttlements that they shouldn't have gotten in the first place..

But it doesn't say patent, it says "legally protected milling to create food release". Again, assuming Majime is American, and assuming they actually have some protection, the protection might not be valid for a German knifemaker.

One fun read was a few years back in a similar case when a cable manufacturer got a patent-related cease-and-desist-letter:

https://www.audioholics.com/news/blue-jeans-strikes-backhttps://www.bluejeanscable.com/legal/mcp/
Click to expand...
great response by Blue Jeans Kurt Denke, I learned a new word - vexatious

@esoo
Nathan Carothers vegetable knife milled from 2016
 
Last edited:
HumbleHomeCook said:
I'm not a patent attorney either.

US Patents went to first to file quite some time ago. In my experience in being a patent recipient and filer, the US Patent Office is every bit as thorough and critical as any other authority.

Patents are only enforceable where the item is sold.

Genuine litigation to protect IP is perfectly legitimate.
Click to expand...

Thank you, then I learned something today too. Sorry for spreading old information. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top