Sequence after thinning?

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Messages
529
Reaction score
1,157
Location
Eastern Connecticut, USA
What is your sequence after thinning to check the outcome - polish then sharpen, or sharpen then polish? (Then cut a carrot).
I go to zero edge while (infrequently) thinning, then polish first, because I can’t imagine preserving the edge while polishing. Then I sharpen, it doesn’t take much, starting with 3-4K. But I usually need to go back for more thinning, thereby starting the rather long operation all over again.
This refers to knives convex BTE.
 
Last edited:
After thinning I try to do some test cuts, carrot, onions, whatever, if it needs more I just go back at it. I can usually tell even if it hasn't been sharpened, I try not to completely remove that original edge anyway.
 
I usually do the heavy lifting on a 200 grit or so stone (currently a Debado 180). When I feel I'm about 70% done, geometry wise, I jump to a SG500 for "final" adjustments. When the geometry is done on the SG500, #200 scratches are also removed. I then use a 1-2k stone to remove SG500 scratches and finally I sharpen the edge on the same stone. Then go cut some carrots.

The finish from coarse stones is too grabby and can feel wedgy, so I like polishing up to 1-2k before testing. Just a quick lazy polish to improve the grabby feeling.

On most knives I try to thin hamaguri-style, so your experience with a zero grind might be different. Also, just before thinning I like to lightly sharpen on a ˜4k stone, just enough to create a visual bevel. As I thin, that bevel gets smaller and smaller, so I use it as a visual guide to how thin I want the BTE area (on a zero grind you erase the bevel completely).
 
I usually do the heavy lifting on a 200 grit or so stone (currently a Debado 180). When I feel I'm about 70% done, geometry wise, I jump to a SG500 for "final" adjustments. When the geometry is done on the SG500, #200 scratches are also removed. I then use a 1-2k stone to remove SG500 scratches and finally I sharpen the edge on the same stone. Then go cut some carrots.

The finish from coarse stones is too grabby and can feel wedgy, so I like polishing up to 1-2k before testing. Just a quick lazy polish to improve the grabby feeling.

On most knives I try to thin hamaguri-style, so your experience with a zero grind might be different. Also, just before thinning I like to lightly sharpen on a ˜4k stone, just enough to create a visual bevel. As I thin, that bevel gets smaller and smaller, so I use it as a visual guide to how thin I want the BTE area (on a zero grind you erase the bevel completely).
Forgot to continue...

If I'm happy with the performance, I go back to the 1-2k stone for a more careful polish, then continue my polishing progression (usually Gesshin 6000 + suita). And finally I resharpen, back to the 1-2k stone and continuing to whatever suits the knife best.
 
I usually do the heavy lifting on a 200 grit or so stone (currently a Debado 180). When I feel I'm about 70% done, geometry wise, I jump to a SG500 for "final" adjustments. When the geometry is done on the SG500, #200 scratches are also removed. I then use a 1-2k stone to remove SG500 scratches and finally I sharpen the edge on the same stone. Then go cut some carrots.

The finish from coarse stones is too grabby and can feel wedgy, so I like polishing up to 1-2k before testing. Just a quick lazy polish to improve the grabby feeling.

On most knives I try to thin hamaguri-style, so your experience with a zero grind might be different. Also, just before thinning I like to lightly sharpen on a ˜4k stone, just enough to create a visual bevel. As I thin, that bevel gets smaller and smaller, so I use it as a visual guide to how thin I want the BTE area (on a zero grind you erase the bevel completely).
By hamaguri-style, do you mean two distinct sections, blade road and cutting edge, with a little blend where they meet?

I think I adopted the zero-grind-while-thinning method because I (maybe mistakenly?) think I’m removing the least amount of blade height by ultimately sharpening on one finer stone, two at the most. Also, even after more than a year of practice, I get better longer lasting edges the fewer stones in my progression.
I should mention that the gear and the practice are good with me, but the real joy is cooking with sharp knives.
 
Before thinning, I'll dull the edge a little.

After thinning on the coarse stone, I'll hit the blade face with some 1k sandpaper a little bit. Just to reduce the extreme grabbiness. If I'm happy, I'll go up to my highest grit stone, then I'll use a sandpaper progression. I'm not a stone polisher whatsoever.

Then sharpen.
 
By hamaguri-style, do you mean two distinct sections, blade road and cutting edge, with a little blend where they meet?

Pretty much, yeah. Calling it hamaguri is a stretch, lol. I just use Jon’s approach here, but adapted to double bevel knives with convex grinds.

https://www.japaneseknifeimports.co...ingle-bevel-sharpening-hamaguri-and-beta-togi
I recently did that to a Misono gyuto. I start by laying the blade road “flat” on the stone, as if it was a single bevel. Here I’m hitting the shoulder, let’s call it the equivalent to the upper part of a hamaguri grind. I put pressure on top of the shoulder and use a very subtle rocking motion with my right wrist to keep the convexity there (lowering the spine like 2 degrees or so… very very gentle).

Then I put pressure near the edge and rock to the opposite direction (raising the spine), again very subtle. Here I’m thinning the lower part of the blade road (first 5-10mm).

Since I’m using a rocking motion, there are no facets to blend. On thinner blades like Misono I find this easier. On thicker sanmai knives I do basically the same thing but no rocking, just changing pressure like Jon’s technique.

I’ve done zero grind thinning but I find it easy to overdo and end up with a foil edge. I blame it on my technique of course.
 
Pretty much, yeah. Calling it hamaguri is a stretch, lol. I just use Jon’s approach here, but adapted to double bevel knives with convex grinds.

https://www.japaneseknifeimports.co...ingle-bevel-sharpening-hamaguri-and-beta-togi
I recently did that to a Misono gyuto. I start by laying the blade road “flat” on the stone, as if it was a single bevel. Here I’m hitting the shoulder, let’s call it the equivalent to the upper part of a hamaguri grind. I put pressure on top of the shoulder and use a very subtle rocking motion with my right wrist to keep the convexity there (lowering the spine like 2 degrees or so… very very gentle).

Then I put pressure near the edge and rock to the opposite direction (raising the spine), again very subtle. Here I’m thinning the lower part of the blade road (first 5-10mm).

Since I’m using a rocking motion, there are no facets to blend. On thinner blades like Misono I find this easier. On thicker sanmai knives I do basically the same thing but no rocking, just changing pressure like Jon’s technique.

I’ve done zero grind thinning but I find it easy to overdo and end up with a foil edge. I blame it on my technique of course.
Thank you for the details and link.
 
Back
Top