Toyama AND Watanabe Gyuto—Redundant?

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Greenbriel

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2021
Messages
644
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Brooklyn, NY
I have a Toyama 210 gyuto (awesome), I found a 210 Wat gyuto and was thinking about getting it before the prices go up. My question is: is that redundant? I've read that the two makers gyutos are *strikingly* similar. Thanks for your opinions!
 
I think when you get them and the weight matters as much or more than which one you get. I have an older Kurouchi Watanabe that is very different from a more recent, iron-clad Migaki Wat. That Migaki is quite similar in feel to my 270, stainless clad Toyama
 
Thanks! Yes, I plan on a 240 at some point. If I see either a Wat or Toyama come up I will grab one. Amazing knives. I'd say those and Yoshi SKD are my favorites at the moment.

Please write something more about Toyama vs Yoshi
 
Which one are you wanting the stainless Toyanabe or the Watayoma?
 
Please write something more about Toyama vs Yoshi
Both amazing 210 gyutos but very different. The Yoshi is semi-stainless and less tall, with a loooong flat spot which I love (the flat spot, I wouldn't mind if it was a bit taller). Also has a lovely handle, at least at CKC. I paid a bit more to get it from there with the burned walnut.

The Toyama has the fairly ubiquitous JNS handle and (to my eye) a more traditional shape.

Both very comfortable, get crazy sharp easily, and cut like nobody's business. Toyama 150 and Wat 180 nakiri are the only other knives I have that fall through food as well as these two. And, surprisingly, a $145 masashi kobo santoku from Aframes is very close.
 
Please write something more about Toyama vs Yoshi

@Greenbriel gave a good overview but one thing to note is that the grind is fairly different between the two. With mine at least, Yoshi is basically a high wide bevel that's flat enough to produce some stiction but is also very thin behind the edge--feels laserish but with more heft in the spine. Toyama is thin behind the edge but a convex grind, which cuts smoothly but also reduces stiction and wedging effects and feels less fragile. It also has a much thicker tip, which makes it more forward balanced and less good for fine work like mincing garlic and shallots.

Both really good knives, my Yoshi SKD 210 isn't going anywhere and I shouldn't have sold my Toyama 240.
 
Since they are both made by Toyama, there is not going to be much difference past the knife-to-knife variations in thickness/weight (which can be considerable - my stainless clad Toyama nakiri weights 175g, but there have been some as heavy as 230g - just an example).
 
Any idea of roughly when the thinning happened? And when was the switch to stainless?

My early 2019 240 Wat Migaki gyuto has the same specs as the current versions in stainless clad. I have an older Kurouchi 270 that is a beast. I really like the 240, but it is not as distinctive as the older one. I'm not sure exactly when they switched to stainless. If I'm not mistaken, it has happened before. The more recent shift must have been around 2021.
 
I sold back my Wat Gyuto because was very similar to my Toyama. So yes, I think you should invest your money on something else.
 
Toyama and watanabe are two of the best knives in this knife world that you can actually obtain whenever you want. The only knives that are decisively above these are the Tsukasa hinouras, the kiyoshi katos, the shigefusas, the konosuke kaiju, and the ashi honyakis.
 
I agree and thank goodness for them! Here's one of mine vs. a jalapeño. So crazy sharp.

 
Toyama and watanabe are two of the best knives in this knife world that you can actually obtain whenever you want. The only knives that are decisively above these are the Tsukasa hinouras, the kiyoshi katos, the shigefusas, the konosuke kaiju, and the ashi honyakis.
Tru dat - when considering the carbon clad variants of Toyama and Wat. The 240+ stainless clad are good knives but not "magic".

Shigs and Kato are good for bragging rights but those that I've had live at someone else's house now. Yawn.
 
main concern for me is how brittle the steel, although can managed with micro bevel. actually prefer my watoyma over my kato std as a cutter. never owned shig tho
 
main concern for me is how brittle the steel, although can managed with micro bevel. actually prefer my watoyma over my kato std as a cutter. never owned shig tho
I have a (quite reasonably priced!) Shig nakiri and it's a great cutter but very reactive. I've never microchipped any of my Watoyamas and I use them a lot.
 
I have two Toyamas 270mm: the stainless version weighs 253 grams and the ironclad, 250 grams. The ironclad's choil a bit thinner and spine a bit more tappered. The stainless with a thicker spine near the handle. Both cut very well.
 
Been trying out my iron clad Wat 270 for the past week or so. I had a Toyama SS clad 240 in the past and it was quite a good cutter but this one is on another level. The zero edge does feel rather delicate but so far no noticable issues with microchipping, despite it regularly sticking into the board. I imagine I'll put a bit more conservative edge angle on it in the future but I really want to see how well the original one holds up.

It's not a perfect knife for me (too much curve in the profile, for one) but it is absolutely among the very best cutters I've tried.

PXL_20220522_010445487.jpg
 
Toyama and watanabe are two of the best knives in this knife world that you can actually obtain whenever you want. The only knives that are decisively above these are the Tsukasa hinouras, the kiyoshi katos, the shigefusas, the konosuke kaiju, and the ashi honyakis.
I really liked my Toyama but I would put the latest batch of Migoto W1 240 ahead of it - could be just personal preference.
 
Back
Top