https://boingboing.net/2022/06/27/p...heir-sexiness-argue-some-paleontologists.html
According to science, dudes have been sharpening stuff for a long, long time, initially hoping to impress the ladies who, presumably, have been reacting with "huh?" for almost nearly as long.
Fortunately for paleontologists, this did not deter said dudes, who switched to just showing off their toys to one another for mutual appreciation.
According to science, dudes have been sharpening stuff for a long, long time, initially hoping to impress the ladies who, presumably, have been reacting with "huh?" for almost nearly as long.
Fortunately for paleontologists, this did not deter said dudes, who switched to just showing off their toys to one another for mutual appreciation.
"Why was time invested in making [handaxes] when less extensively retouched artefacts, or even plain unretouched flakes, are suitable for tasks such as butchery, woodworking and the other activities for which handaxes were used?" asked Dr. Marek Kohn and Dr. Steven Mithen in their paper "Handaxes: Products of Sexual Selection?" published in Antiquity 73, 1999.
Their answer: "Teardrop-shaped handaxes were products of sexual selection and as such were integral to the processes of mate choice within socially complex and competitive groups."
Kohn and Mithen's argument is commonly referred to as the "sexy handaxe theory," and paleontologists have been debating it for over 20 years.