SOLD Righty Kipp AEB-L 225mm Gyuto and Isasmedjan Cleaver

[nhb22]

This is not a bundle.

These two knives are pre-orders

These two knives are not available at this moment

(Sold) The Kipp is a 225mm AEB-L LP which I pre-ordered on Jan 19 of this year. It should be ready in the next month or two but no guarantee. It will be ready when Jules can finish it.

The Jonas is the pre-order from this morning. https://www.isasmedjan.com/product/190-cleaver-pre-order

Shipping to US has been paid for both so prefer US buyers.

I can most likely just ask each maker to cancel and refund me, but I'd like to transfer these two preorders to people who want them here especially the Kipp that I have already waited 4 months for.

NOTE: I prefer to transfer these to people who have bought from or sold knives to me or have had conversations with me before.

I paid $705 for the Kipp. You will pay me $726 via PP G&S and I will ask Jules to transfer the preorder to you

I paid $353 for the Jonas. You will pay me $363 via PP G&S and I will ask Jonas to transfer the preorder to you

If this is against the BST rule below, I'm happy to delete the post.

"New: Product listed for sale must be in possession of member listing it. Member may not list product for a non-member. Member may not list product in transit. Member shall not list item being worked on or held by another entity."

 

[nhb22]

Kipp sold

 

[nhb22]

both sold in seconds...thanks all

 

[deadwood212]

Wildly quick!

 

[blokey]

I read this as Kip cleaver and damn…

 

[chiffonodd]

"New: Product listed for sale must be in possession of member listing it. Member may not list product for a non-member. Member may not list product in transit. Member shall not list item being worked on or held by another entity."

My unsolicited lawyerly take is that your post should be fine because you are in constructive possession of the knife, seeing as how you are the lawful purchaser of the as-of-yet undelivered knife and have the right to control the disposition thereof.



[Edit] The above random musings are not legal advice

 

[Just a DK]

My unsolicited lawyerly take is that your post should be fine because you are in constructive possession of the knife, seeing as how you are the lawful purchaser of the as-of-yet undelivered knife and have the right to control the disposition thereof.

 

[HolyDiverScallop]

My unsolicited lawyerly take is that your post should be fine because you are in constructive possession of the knife, seeing as how you are the lawful purchaser of the as-of-yet undelivered knife and have the right to control the disposition thereof.

Look at the NFA on Brad.

 

[chiffonodd]

Look at the NFA on Brad.

lol i said lawerly not binding legal

 

[nhb22]

This was the best sale I have ever made in BST. Sold in seconds and no packing and shipping…and I didn’t lose money

 

[Hassanbensober]

So the makers of the knives are going to assume all responsibility for the shipping of the knives? Why on earth would they agree to that?

 

[NickMinton]

So you bought a knife(s) and sold it before you even got it??

I don’t follow

 

[nhb22]

So the makers of the knives are going to assume all responsibility for the shipping of the knives? Why on earth would they agree to that?

I don’t follow your question. I paid for knives including shipping to US. The makers need to fulfill the order by shipping the knife to somewhere in the US when the knives are ready. I ask them to change the shipping address in their record. Hope this clarifies.

 

[nhb22]

So you bought a knife(s) and sold it before you even got it??

I don’t follow

Read my reply above. Happy to further clarify if still not clear

 

[chiffonodd]

So the makers of the knives are going to assume all responsibility for the shipping of the knives? Why on earth would they agree to that?

It's just swapping out the identity of the purchaser, as far as the Maker is concerned. Person A purchases knife, at which point the Maker incurs the responsibility of shipping the knife safely to Person A. Prior to shipment, Person A transfers their right of possession to Person B by selling the as-of-yet undelivered knife to Person B. If the Maker agrees to this arrangement, the Maker is thereby relieved of the responsibility to ship the knife safely to Person A, and incurs the responsibility to ship the knife to Person B, instead.

Obviously, the Maker could refuse, because there is no privity of contract between the Maker and Person B, but the Maker may be willing to agree to the arrangement in order to avoid cancellation of the sale, or to build and/or maintain goodwill.

 

[More_Gyutos]

.

 

[Molokai Livin']

Law school exam questions in BST

 

[nhb22]

It's just swapping out the identity of the purchaser, as far as the Maker is concerned. Person A purchases knife, at which point the Maker incurs the responsibility of shipping the knife safely to Person A. Prior to shipment, Person A transfers their right of possession to Person B by selling the as-of-yet undelivered knife to Person B. If the Maker agrees to this arrangement, the Maker is thereby relieved of the responsibility to ship the knife safely to Person A, and incurs the responsibility to ship the knife to Person B, instead.

Obviously, the Maker could refuse, because there is no privity of contract between the Maker and Person B, but the Maker may be willing to agree to the arrangement in order to avoid cancellation of the sale, or to build and/or maintain goodwill.

Lord. Never thought I would hear the word privity here. In my first BST transaction, the other person (now a good friend) started talking about ROFR, options, etc. I was shocked. We definitely have some sophisticated deals people here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we start introducing indemnity, reps, covenants, funds flow, closing day mechanisms into BST deals.

 

[chiffonodd]

Lord. Never thought I would hear the word privity here. In my first BST transaction, the other person (now a good friend) started talking about ROFR, options, etc. I was shocked. We definitely have some sophisticated deals people here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we start introducing indemnity, reps, covenants, funds flow, closing day mechanisms into BST deals.

Bunch of knife knerd degenerate *professionals* lol

 

[aporigine]

So you bought a knife(s) and sold it before you even got it??

I don’t follow

It qualifies as a weird, refined instance of substance abuse.

 

[nhb22]

It qualifies as a weird, refined instance of substance abuse.

I feel my English is rather limited…

 

[aporigine]

I feel my English is rather limited…

effectively, you got a serotonin rush out of knives never touched. I meant nothing stranger.

 

[daveb]

If this is against the BST rule below, I'm happy to delete the post.

"New: Product listed for sale must be in possession of member listing it. Member may not list product for a non-member. Member may not list product in transit. Member shall not list item being worked on or held by another entity."

Not sure which part of the rule is ambiguous. It most certainly breaks it. But OBE.

Rational is that when you buy or arrange to have a knife delivered - you are accepting the risk that it may not be. If you sell a knife not in your possession, you are transferring that risk to a third party buyer - and they may not get that part.

Know that if it happens again you'll probably lose bst privileges forever and a day.