Shapton Rockstar 3k stone is magnesia binder

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The type is listed as wa. That’s all I can see they actually say


It indicates the type of abrasive contained in the sharpening stone.
HA: Mono-crystalline fused alumina
PA: Pink alumina
WA: White alumina
A: Regular (brown) alumina
CA: Calcined alumina
HPA: High purity alumina
 
So. What do we have here, answer-wise:

Somebody talking about abrasive (WA), not binder;
Somebody saying resinoid, from referencing my own post. (mea culpa and all that, but still...)

As for contacting Shapton... I will not waste my time; they will not give a straight answer to this pointed of a question regarding their manufacturing process.

Anyhow. It feels harder than any resinoid I have, but sounds duller than any magnesia stone I own, including Shapton Kuromaku.

Anyway, this post is meant as a disclaimer for my above referenced low-effort guess-post:

Don't assume Shapton Rockstar stones are resinoid based on my aforementioned surmise.
 
Use a blow torch on a corner. If it burns, it's resinoid.
Doesn't start aflame. There appears to be a slight combustion, which I think is mold-release burning. Heated corner feels a bit more crumbly, but not melty, if you see what I mean.

I habitually try to avoid taking blowtorches to stones. But, okay, science.

edit: a lot more crumbly, on closer inspection...
 
So. What do we have here, answer-wise:

Somebody talking about abrasive (WA), not binder;
Somebody saying resinoid, from referencing my own post. (mea culpa and all that, but still...)

As for contacting Shapton... I will not waste my time; they will not give a straight answer to this pointed of a question regarding their manufacturing process.

Anyhow. It feels harder than any resinoid I have, but sounds duller than any magnesia stone I own, including Shapton Kuromaku.

Anyway, this post is meant as a disclaimer for my above referenced low-effort guess-post:

Don't assume Shapton Rockstar stones are resinoid based on my aforementioned surmise.
I was quoting the message above yours.
Shapton got back to me. To summarize:
RockStar and GlassStone are the same; RockStar is thicker and does not have backing.
Japanese retail RS product has printed graphics, overseas/US retail models will not. RockStar series available from US retailers est. 1-2 months. It's Splash-n-Go, white alumina. Fancy option comes with a stainless case.
So it would seem that contacting the manufacturer would be worthwhile if you really want the question settled.
 
Stones can have fills and treatments in addition to the bond. A vitrified stone that has a combustible fill will show a flame even while the stone itself does not burn.
 
Stones can have fills and treatments in addition to the bond. A vitrified stone that has a combustible fill will show a flame even while the stone itself does not burn.
We talking Gokumyo process? Otherwise, I cannot think of any stone I have heard of which would fit what you describe. Or perhaps you mean like pre-filled Norton stones and the like.
 
I was quoting the message above yours.

So it would seem that contacting the manufacturer would be worthwhile if you really want the question settled.
I was assuming about Rockstars being resinoid based on what information I could find on Glass Stones.

If the exact make-up of Glass Stones is still this unclear from the manufacturer's mouth several years after their introduction, I'm not at all optimistic about getting a straight answer out of Shapton from asking them...

Case in point, the person you were quoting...
 
We talking Gokumyo process? Otherwise, I cannot think of any stone I have heard of which would fit what you describe. Or perhaps you mean like pre-filled Norton stones and the like.
I am not familiar with the "Gokumyo process" so if you have information on that please direct me to it.

I am referring to fills of resin, sulfur, wax, etc. that are injected into some industrial alumina and possibly silicon carbide stones to modify their behavior, for example to:
  • Reduce porosity
  • Decrease rate of wear and increase integrity
  • Finish more finely
  • Resist loading
 
I was assuming about Rockstars being resinoid based on what information I could find on Glass Stones.

If the exact make-up of Glass Stones is still this unclear from the manufacturer's mouth several years after their introduction, I'm not at all optimistic about getting a straight answer out of Shapton from asking them...

Case in point, the person you were quoting...
Another secondary source: What is a Shapton glass stone made out of?

1707167584425.png

Shapton acknowledge that there is something in the stone besides abrasive and binder, “filler” seems a reasonable name for it. I remember Cliff Stamp saying the coarse Shapton Pros have some kind of waxlike substance in the pores that was visible under a microscope.
 
I am not familiar with the "Gokumyo process" so if you have information on that please direct me to it.

I am referring to fills of resin, sulfur, wax, etc. that are injected into some industrial alumina and possibly silicon carbide stones to modify their behavior, for example to:
  • Reduce porosity
  • Decrease rate of wear and increase integrity
  • Finish more finely
  • Resist loading
Ah. Very interesting re: the industrial processes. Thanks for the taking the time!

Gokumyo is Suehiro's trademark name for at least 3 of its higher-end, higher-grit stones (Suehiro's marketing is confusing, so maybe they have other "Gokumyo" stones besides those I am thinking of; 10k, 15k, 20k.

My wild surmise regarding the Gokumyo series is that they are an abrasive-rich, binder-reduced vitrified process (for abrasive performance), which is then resin-filled for structural integrity and to make it splash-&-go. As I say, this is all wild conjecture on my part.
 
I remember Cliff Stamp saying the coarse Shapton Pros have some kind of waxlike substance in the pores that was visible under a microscope.
RIP. I remember Cliff Stamp once saying in one video, the King Deluxe 1k was resinoid.

Does this machine convey irony? Who among us... I mean.

Wax-like filler in Shapton Pro would begin to explain the hydrophobia both they and the Rockstars have, when new. I've noticed the Rockstars regenerate some hydrophobic layer over a much briefer period of disuse, than do the Pros. Then again, the Pros are more worn and nearly 5 years old.
 
My wild surmise regarding the Gokumyo series is that they are an abrasive-rich, binder-reduced vitrified process (for abrasive performance), which is then resin-filled for structural integrity and to make it splash-&-go. As I say, this is all wild conjecture on my part.
That sounds entirely plausible.
 
Back
Top