Barry's Knives
Well-Known Member
I've seen people posting things like "wide bevels aren't for me" but if there easier to thin and maintain, what are the disadvantages?
You can't really hone it with a ceramic honing rod, slightly harder to sharpen(kinda like single bevel but on both sides where hand placement and pressure matters), bad skill/stones will ruin the finish, etc...I've seen people posting things like "wide bevels aren't for me" but if there easier to thin and maintain, what are the disadvantages?
You can run your finger over the blade and feel a distinct beginning of the grind. My shigehiro has just Kasumi finish but you can feel it. It also becomes evident the first time you thin the knife.To add to @Barry's Knives' question: how can I tell whether a knife is truly wide bevel (think Tsubaya Tanaka and Kagekiyo) or just has a wide shinogi aesthetics (recent batches of Mazaki)?
You can run your finger over the blade and feel a distinct beginning of the grind. My shigehiro has just Kasumi finish but you can feel it. It also becomes evident the first time you thin the knife.
Oh yeah I keep forgetting about those. I don't think I'll ever naturally think of them as a wide bevel... they sit in a different category for me.The width of the bevel plays an important role. Knives were the wide
bevel is on the narrow side can have excellent food release and separation. My Moritaka and Takeda nakiris and gyuto by Bryan are very good examples.
And if you put a clam edge o it would you still expect the same problem?My Tsubaya Tanaka has hilariously terrible food release, but it flies through dense 2" horse carrots
Putting a thicker near-edge geometry on a thin bevel usually reduces cutting performance and increases stickiness. Separation in a cut is not enhanced in the first few mm behind the edge.And if you put a clam edge o it would you still expect the same problem?
Wide bevels sit quite badly on the scale of food release vs food separation.
They have limited distal taper too.
If you polish well even with synthetics this isnt a problem thougb. Once you've set up a decent base you can get an even finish every timeI think aesthetically it is a pain to maintain, or you just have to accept swirls on half your knife. Have you ever seen a user yanagi? Not pretty. And who has the time to polish it out on nats or finger stones constantly?
What about a convex grind wide bevel? Togaashi is a good example. Basically I cant foresee how having a wide bevel would make food release worse if it was still ground with this in mind. https://hitohira-japan.com/collections/in-stock-1/products/aaa-026-24-fa240Putting a thicker near-edge geometry on a thin bevel usually reduces cutting performance and increases stickiness. Separation in a cut is not enhanced in the first few mm behind the edge.
To define a wide bevel, it would have to have a shinogi line (or shoulders) running definitively down the length of the blade. To do this requires some extra meat directly in that area.What about a convex grind wide bevel? Togaashi is a good example. Basically I cant foresee how having a wide bevel would make food release worse if it was still ground with this in mind. https://hitohira-japan.com/collections/in-stock-1/products/aaa-026-24-fa240
Please don't forget there are also advantages to this style, and to take my over-simplified explanation to mean"wide-bevels are inherently bad" would be inaccurate and unfair. There are some really nice ones out there, and in many cases food release and food separation are simply not relevant....what are the disadvantages?
I modified a picture from your link, it's very subtle...
Thanks for the informative reply!! Very interesting.To define a wide bevel, it would have to have a shinogi line (or shoulders) running definitively down the length of the blade. To do this requires some extra meat directly in that area.
So basically, no matter how well you make a wide bevel - even if it behaves better than any other wide bevel in existence - the performance could still be improved by removing the shinogi / shoulders. Doing so will have one of two effects: In the case of a laser wide bevel, removing the shoulders helps to rid the knife of huge flat spots coming into contact with the food, increasing food release. In the case of a workhorse wide-bevel, removing the shoulders will help stop the knife acting like a wedge monster, increasing food separation. Then there is an overlap of the two effects at the grey area in the middle.
I wanna make it clear though, this is just to answer the question:
Please don't forget there are also advantages to this style, and to take my over-simplified explanation to mean"wide-bevels are inherently bad" would be inaccurate and unfair. There are some really nice ones out there, and in many cases food release and food separation are simply not relevant.
Enter your email address to join: