Se1ryu
Senior Member
Hi I wonder if anyone tried both of the Atoma 120 and 400 for stone flattening like medium to super fine. Which one do you prefer and why??
Is it 120 grit Atoma too coarse for medium to fine grit and leave deep scratches on the stone??
Is it 400 gri Atoma to weak and will take a long time to flattening like ceramic stone which dish very bad?
I'm currently using Suisin stone fixer that I bought 13 years ago and still use it until now. I forgot the grit since I lose the original paper box. I use it for fixing chip on the flat side and flattening on the other side. But steel got harder and stone we use is getting harder too, so I need a better flattening stone. Any suggestions?? Should I get the 400 grit for flattening medium to super fine stone (8000 and above) or just get the 120 and use my Suisin chewing/ stone fixer to remove the deep scratches from 120 grit Atoma??
Please share your experience
Is it 120 grit Atoma too coarse for medium to fine grit and leave deep scratches on the stone??
Is it 400 gri Atoma to weak and will take a long time to flattening like ceramic stone which dish very bad?
I'm currently using Suisin stone fixer that I bought 13 years ago and still use it until now. I forgot the grit since I lose the original paper box. I use it for fixing chip on the flat side and flattening on the other side. But steel got harder and stone we use is getting harder too, so I need a better flattening stone. Any suggestions?? Should I get the 400 grit for flattening medium to super fine stone (8000 and above) or just get the 120 and use my Suisin chewing/ stone fixer to remove the deep scratches from 120 grit Atoma??
Please share your experience