Okubo v. Shindo

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

henkle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
204
Reaction score
275
Location
Hong Kong
I know questions like this are hard to address given the number of variables between steels and types of knives, but I'm wondering, given that Okubo and Shindo seem to be the new go-tos for less expensive, rustic, but well-made blades, are there any things that you might point out that are significant differences between the two smiths? in other words, if I owned a knife by one of the two makers would a knife by the other maker be redundant? For example, both make an blue #2 nakiri. Any thoughts?
 
This feels like bait lol.

Long story short: super different, not redundant in the slightest, and 2 of my favorite makers. I've had a Shindo 220 gyuto, nakiri, a tall nakiri, and a bunka. Also have Okubo 180 big nakiri and 250 gyuto.

Kyohei Shindo knives are thick spined, particularly at the pinch, with very aggressive distal taper, particularly on the gyuto or bunka. They're all extremely thin behind the edge, and he does a hammered S-grind that helps with food release. Nice steel, pleasant to sharpen and retains its tooth for quite a while, but even when dull it's a geometry cutter due to how thin BTE. Choil photos show below. They're not super heavy knives, with a bead blasted kasumi and dark KU with lacquer. Even without lacquer, they're not particularly reactive.

20231030_181911.jpg


20230720_181505.jpg

20231030_182014.jpg



Okubo is on the other side of the spectrum from a grind perspective. Thicc convex that does not look good from a choil shot but cuts very well. Superb food release, minimal distal taper, no lacquer on a thick scaley KU. They're heavy, forward balanced, particularly because the handle is super light. My Okubo 180x63 nakiri is 234 g. Excellent steel, no lacquer, delightful to sharpen, stiff. Just a true workhorse that will keep you happy. There's a little more curve to a standard Okubo nakiri than a standard Shindo, but the Shindo tall nakiri is the most curvy so...idk. They all are nice, they cut very differently, get both, be joyous. Feel free to ask any specifics.

20240116_123444.jpg
20240116_122410.jpg
20240116_122514.jpg
 
Last edited:
Opposite ends of performance spectrum.

Okubo is thick convex grind, solid workhorse feel

Kyohei Shindo is extremely thin concave grind. It has thick spine out of the handle, but tapers down very quickly. Also the cladding on the Shindo is crazy reactive.
 
I can't compare because I don't have a Shindo, but looking at the Choil shot and grind I would say they are very different. The Okubo large custom Kajiya Takenoko Nakiri/Cleaver is just a joy of a work horse to use. The Okubo are a stiff blade. I know he water quenches not sure if Shino does or not. The Okubo steel rings like a bell.
 
I have the Okubo Santoku and the Shindo gyuto and bunka. Okubo-san grinds one of the best convex grinds out there. It's a real pleasure. I think they both cut way better than they have any right to. @SwampDonkey summed it up best but I wanted to praise Okubo san's grind some more. They are really both great. I was so surprised when I cut with the Shindo the first time, how well it cut. But the Okubo's grind might be the best value grind out there.
 
This feels like bait lol.

Long story short: super different, not redundant in the slightest, and 2 of my favorite makers. I've had a Shindo 220 gyuto, nakiri, a tall nakiri, and a bunka. Also have Okubo 180 big nakiri and 250 gyuto. Both are 2 of my favorite makers.

Kyohei Shindo knives are thick spined, particularly at the pinch, with very aggressive distal taper, particularly on the gyuto or bunka. They're all extremely thin behind the edge, and he does a hammered S-grind that helps with food release. Nice steel, pleasant to sharpen and retains its tooth for quite a while, but even when dull it's a geometry cutter due to how thin BTE. Choil photos show below. They're not super heavy knives, with a bead blasted kasumi and dark KU with lacquer. Even without lacquer, they're not particularly reactive.

View attachment 298433

View attachment 298431
View attachment 298434


Okubo is on the other side of the spectrum from a grind perspective. Thicc convex that does not look good from a choil shot but cuts very well. Superb food release, minimal distal taper, no lacquer on a thick scaley KU. They're heavy, forward balanced, particularly because the handle is super light. My Okubo 180x63 nakiri is 234 g. Excellent steel, no lacquer, delightful to sharpen, stiff. Just a true workhorse that will keep you happy. There's a little more curve to a standard Okubo nakiri than a standard Shindo, but the Shindo tall nakiri is the most curvy so...idk. They all are nice, they cut very differently, get both, be joyous. Feel free to ask any specifics.

View attachment 298436View attachment 298437View attachment 298438
Wow, thanks for your in-depth and thoughtful reply. Cheers!
 
This feels like bait lol.

Long story short: super different, not redundant in the slightest, and 2 of my favorite makers. I've had a Shindo 220 gyuto, nakiri, a tall nakiri, and a bunka. Also have Okubo 180 big nakiri and 250 gyuto.

Kyohei Shindo knives are thick spined, particularly at the pinch, with very aggressive distal taper, particularly on the gyuto or bunka. They're all extremely thin behind the edge, and he does a hammered S-grind that helps with food release. Nice steel, pleasant to sharpen and retains its tooth for quite a while, but even when dull it's a geometry cutter due to how thin BTE. Choil photos show below. They're not super heavy knives, with a bead blasted kasumi and dark KU with lacquer. Even without lacquer, they're not particularly reactive.







Okubo is on the other side of the spectrum from a grind perspective. Thicc convex that does not look good from a choil shot but cuts very well. Superb food release, minimal distal taper, no lacquer on a thick scaley KU. They're heavy, forward balanced, particularly because the handle is super light. My Okubo 180x63 nakiri is 234 g. Excellent steel, no lacquer, delightful to sharpen, stiff. Just a true workhorse that will keep you happy. There's a little more curve to a standard Okubo nakiri than a standard Shindo, but the Shindo tall nakiri is the most curvy so...idk. They all are nice, they cut very differently, get both, be joyous. Feel free to ask any specifics.

View attachment 298438
Off-subject, and I hope you don’t mind my asking, but what’s this knife on your line-up?
680FD7C9-65D0-4A49-B179-705A3C4DBF7A.jpeg
 
Off-subject, and I hope you don’t mind my asking, but what’s this knife on your line-up?
View attachment 299152
HHC is right, it's the Okahide sabaki. It's replaced all my western butcher knives and doubles as a thicc petty. Thick spine, stiff, and enough meat behind the edge it can knick bones and go through chicken joints without any issue. Okahide puts a great edge on it too, edge lasted a very long time.
20230102_165555.jpg
20230102_165632.jpg
20230102_165759.jpg
20230102_165820.jpg
 
Does anyone know if the Enjin line of Shindo knives are the same as other Shindo knives sold out elsewhere?
The Enjin's come in SRK8 and aogami 2. From what I can tell there isn't much/if any difference from the aogami Enjin vs Shindo's normal stuff except for the half-burnt handle CKTG slaps on there. My gyuto is an Enjin, 220x52 and seems no different than the other knives of his. Just a handle upgrade from the cheap stock one.

I can't speak to the SRK8 at all, haven't tried one.
 
The Enjin's come in SRK8 and aogami 2. From what I can tell there isn't much/if any difference from the aogami Enjin vs Shindo's normal stuff except for the half-burnt handle CKTG slaps on there. My gyuto is an Enjin, 220x52 and seems no different than the other knives of his. Just a handle upgrade from the cheap stock one.

I can't speak to the SRK8 at all, haven't tried one.
I've only tried the Enjin blue 2 version but it's very consistent with descriptions of other Shindos here. The handle feels reasonably good although it's a little big for the blade size but otherwise I can't complain, it's a wildly good cutter for the price. Wish I could snag a 240.
 
Back
Top