Yeah of course. It’s a great knife and beautiful either way just don’t have a suiboku to compare it too and wasn’t sure what the difference was on finish.I think suiboku is a carbon steel finish.
Whatever the name of your finish, Takada is a master sharpener/finisher/polisher and you should enjoy his work.
I'm impressed, its still kind different from iron cladded ones but much better than most. Ginsan Kasumi always feels weird to me, just very grainy and artificialNah they do it on ginsan. That looks like suiboku to me?
https://carbonknifeco.com/products/takada-no-hamono-suiboku-ginsan-gyuto-210mm
Love the look, how do you like the knife so far?
Really like it so far. Only prepped dinner once but coming from no experience with a Takada I think I’m starting to understand the hype a bit more. Balance, f&f, and cutting performance stood out immediately and are fantastic. Also love the profile on it. Only gripe is it’s on the shorter side. Haven’t measured it yet but the height has to be sub 50Love the look, how do you like the knife so far
Thanks, this is what I was looking for. Def kasumi then if suiboku is more polish smooth.From the pics it looks like the kasumi finish.
Another way to tell them apart is by touch - the suiboku finish has a polished smooth feel too it, while the kasumi finish has a sandpaper smooth feeling (as @blokey mentioned).
The cloudy finish should be above the cladding line, on most kasumi knives the cladding is very very visible and stone polishing make them pop. I've never heard of a purpose of kasumi should be to hide the cladding line but that's just meI see a clear cladding line on the blade. How is that a kasumi finish? I thought the purpose of the kasumi finish was to obscure the cladding line or make it cloudy. At least the kasumi blades I own all do that.
I see a clear cladding line on the blade. How is that a kasumi finish? I thought the purpose of the kasumi finish was to obscure the cladding line or make it cloudy. At least the kasumi blades I own all do that.
Hey, just out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?Both are mainline Takada No Hamono (not Tsubaya) editions.
I thought I’d add a data point here since I just received a suiboku gyuto in blue 2 and a suiboku sujihiki in ginsan this week, and thought the contrast between the two was interesting. Both are mainline Takada No Hamono (not Tsubaya) editions.
The blue 2’s suiboku finish looks very different to the ginsan’s suiboku finish. The ginsan is much more subtle (and hard to photograph). It’s bordering on a mirror finish. If I hadn’t read the comment in this thread about the suiboku’s polished smooth feel, I’d have thought for sure I received a kasumi. Physically, the smoothness of the two knives’ finish feels identical.
I still haven’t seen a totally authoritative rundown of the difference (if any). Obviously you get Tsubaya engraved kanji vs the Takada stamp on the show side. I’ve seen experienced KKFers state the two lines are 100% identical beyond the maker’s mark, and then I’ve seen others claim (as in a comment above) the Tsubaya editions have a less detailed finish (or even that they have a slightly thicker grind and lower heel height for the Japanese market). Given the difference in price, the latter could make sense, but I don’t have enough knowledge to say either way.Hey, just out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?
Yes, it’s definitely quite the mystery seeing the suiboku finish in person. It seems almost behind the “skin” of the metal rather than just being a simple etched surface treatment. I don’t buy the “crumpled rag soaked in acid” theory.It just adds to the mystery of how that suiboku finish is obtained.
Enter your email address to join: