Maybe they hand select the crappy stones for export?
That's possible, but I think it's unlikely. When I have the choice between a conspiracy and stuff-up, 99.9% of the time it's a stuff-up.
Intel for example only makes like 3 cpus and when they work as supposed its the gazzilion core highest ghz one. And when they don't: they clock them down, and disable cache and cores. And voila now we have 40 different cpus. I guess it work similar to that too at tsuboman.
That's partly true, but a little over-simplified, I think. It's not a matter of black and white, but shades of grey. It's related to yield (what percentage of chips in a batch work for a particular performance threshold). A chip that works well at 3 GHz may fail at 4 GHz. Rather than throwing it away, they sell it as a 3 GHz one for less than one that works at 4 GHz.
The proliferation of models is also due to having models with low power requirements for portable devices, models for desktops, and models for servers. Plus models with different numbers of cores and cache sizes. These are
not the same chips artificially crippled, and Intel most definitely make
way more than three or so distinctly different CPUs.
Some of the model proliferation is also due to marketing pressures. If Intel don't have something that fills a niche that is currently filled by AMD, it can make sense (in a perverse sort of way) for them to quickly make a minor change to a chip and sell it into that niche even though, theoretically, they could just sell a more powerful chip for less. But doing that would hurt their profit in a different niche, so they don't, and they might even sell that particular model at a loss or very low margin.
They are not saints at Intel and, back in 2010 or so, they came up with the monumentally stupid idea to sell CPUs that blocked some features and then could be unlocked to their full potential by consumers for an extra $50. But that did
not go down well with consumers and, as far as I know, Intel haven't done anything like that since.