I recently got this. So far i like it.
Great. I have experience only with the SG220, JKI Pink and Debado 180 and echo your impressions (I'd chose the SG220 among those).I've been churning through a LOT of coarse synthetics recently trying to find what I like. Here are some of my thoughts:
Nanohone Diamond Resin 200u / 100u
Despite the weird feedback, these stones don't dish and don't glaze and require just a small splash of water. They cut steel and clad evenly and are good for precise work as they don't produce much slurry or dish leading to crisp grinding for bevels. The bad is that they are nowhere near as coarse in behavior as the micron rating suggests. I think the 200 behaves more like a 400 grit stone and the 100 maybe as fine as 800 grit. These would not be my first choice for grinding but they do a great job cleaning scratches from true coarse stones and leaving a nice base finish, particularly on mono steel.
NSK Hakuto Series 400
Very, very good! This is the best balance I've found so far of precision and speed. Better feeling than harder vits or diamond resin but still much more manageable than a soft coarse trad synthetic. I'll be picking up the 200 soon and have heard it suffers from less of the compromises the Kyokuha at 200 grit does.
NSK Kyokuha 200
When it works it works very well, but I've had issues with keeping the surface well conditioned in longer sessions, which is a bit of a pain. I'd personally stick to the Hakuto series based on my limited experience.
JKI Pink Brick
Not great, not terrible. For something cheap and for someone who's more interested in periodic maintenance thinning vs polishing or precise grinding a great option I'd happily recommend.
Debado 180
Great... if you get a good one. Ideally they're fairly hard but without terrible glazing and cut quickly. Some dishing, some glazing, but all things considered a good balance between the too with no characteristic being extreme. Manageable scratch pattern for something this coarse. The problem is they're inconsistent stone to stone and sometimes within the same stone. I and others have experienced this which makes me hesitate to recommend it.
Kasfly sandpaper holder
I know some people swear by it, but I find it a bid fiddly given the need to trim and mount paper. I also had issues with maintaining crisp shinogi or shoulders as I was grinding away. Given the right user and application though I can definitely see the use case for this.
Shapton Glass 220
If you're limited to splash and go, don't want something as coarse as the Debado 180, and don't want to splurge on diamonds this I think is a good option.
As fast as my 220 pink brick I think not as fast as debadoGreat. I have experience only with the SG220, JKI Pink and Debado 180 and echo your impressions (I'd chose the SG220 among those).
NSK Hakuto 400 - do you feel it's true to its grit, in terms of speed?
sounds good! maybe the 200 from the same series works best for serious thinning but the 400 also seems capable?As fast as my 220 pink brick I think not as fast as debado
Which hardness level did you pick for the Hakuto?I've been churning through a LOT of coarse synthetics recently trying to find what I like. Here are some of my thoughts:
Nanohone Diamond Resin 200u / 100u
Despite the weird feedback, these stones don't dish and don't glaze and require just a small splash of water. They cut steel and clad evenly and are good for precise work as they don't produce much slurry or dish leading to crisp grinding for bevels. The bad is that they are nowhere near as coarse in behavior as the micron rating suggests. I think the 200 behaves more like a 400 grit stone and the 100 maybe as fine as 800 grit. These would not be my first choice for grinding but they do a great job cleaning scratches from true coarse stones and leaving a nice base finish, particularly on mono steel.
NSK Hakuto Series 400
Very, very good! This is the best balance I've found so far of precision and speed. Better feeling than harder vits or diamond resin but still much more manageable than a soft coarse trad synthetic. I'll be picking up the 200 soon and have heard it suffers from less of the compromises the Kyokuha at 200 grit does.
NSK Kyokuha 200
When it works it works very well, but I've had issues with keeping the surface well conditioned in longer sessions, which is a bit of a pain. I'd personally stick to the Hakuto series based on my limited experience.
JKI Pink Brick
Not great, not terrible. For something cheap and for someone who's more interested in periodic maintenance thinning vs polishing or precise grinding a great option I'd happily recommend.
Debado 180
Great... if you get a good one. Ideally they're fairly hard but without terrible glazing and cut quickly. Some dishing, some glazing, but all things considered a good balance between the too with no characteristic being extreme. Manageable scratch pattern for something this coarse. The problem is they're inconsistent stone to stone and sometimes within the same stone. I and others have experienced this which makes me hesitate to recommend it.
Kasfly sandpaper holder
I know some people swear by it, but I find it a bid fiddly given the need to trim and mount paper. I also had issues with maintaining crisp shinogi or shoulders as I was grinding away. Given the right user and application though I can definitely see the use case for this.
Shapton Glass 220
If you're limited to splash and go, don't want something as coarse as the Debado 180, and don't want to splurge on diamonds this I think is a good option.
How do you like the Chosera 400, Ed?400s, great and fast and feels fairly good. I’d maybe get one a little firmer next time
Can't say I have much experience with that one. I really like the Gesshin 400 as far as synthetic coarse stones go though.How do you like the Chosera 400, Ed?
I've bought 4 debado 180 and can not believe the variation stone to stone. One very hard, two very soft. One is very very good. Not too much glazing, manageable dishing. Nice even scratch patter that is easy to progress from.Debado 180
Great... if you get a good one. Ideally they're fairly hard but without terrible glazing and cut quickly. Some dishing, some glazing, but all things considered a good balance between the too with no characteristic being extreme. Manageable scratch pattern for something this coarse. The problem is they're inconsistent stone to stone and sometimes within the same stone. I and others have experienced this which makes me hesitate to recommend it.
400s, great and fast and feels fairly good. I’d maybe get one a little firmer next time
I wonder if the one I have is bad.I've bought 4 debado 180 and can not believe the variation stone to stone. One very hard, two very soft. One is very very good. Not too much glazing, manageable dishing. Nice even scratch patter that is easy to progress from.
Unfortunately I'm sharpening all day every day, so the one stone I actually like won't be with us much longer.
I purchased these all at the same time, from the same source. Very disappointing.
I had that issue with my 200 until I got the surfaced properly conditioned. I used 60 grit SIC and granite to flatten the surface and uncover a lot of abrasive. Only requires that treatment every hour or so of use now.I wonder if the one I have is bad.
It probably is, it glazes a lot and requires frequent lapping.
Thanks, considering to grab a 400 stone but there're really quite some options. hmmmCan't say I have much experience with that one. I really like the Gesshin 400 as far as synthetic coarse stones go though.
+1. can’t go wrong with Gesshin stonesCan't say I have much experience with that one. I really like the Gesshin 400 as far as synthetic coarse stones go though.
Enter your email address to join: