[TLDR]: Please take a look at the choil shots and tell me if I'm right in the assumption that the two gyutos are thicker behind the edge which changes their cutting feel.
Hi guys,
I wonder why two new knives I got don't exactly perform as I was expecting. Please note that this is not a criticism of the knives, which certainly are great, but an attempt to understand some of the finer points of knife geometry and performance.
The knives in question are two MCX Honyaki Gyutos which I recently got. One by Spare, one by Isasmedjan. Both are very well-made knives, it shows in every detail. But with denser vegetables, they don't go through as easily as my two most used knives are going through. These two are a Denka Nakiri and a Togashi K-Gyuto.
So, what's my point? For most cooking tasks, they perform very close to each other.
But it's with denser vegetables that the two Gyutos don't go through nearly as easily as I would have thought. I do a lot of julienned carrots, and here they require more pressure to go thorugh than I'm used to. Which is especially not ideal when you have stacked the layers. I think it's fair to rule out sharpness per se, I can elaborate if you want details. I sharpened them all on a 1000 Bester with a one-side refinement on a Rika 5k.
I don't think it's due to knife type - the Togashi isn't a nakiri, after all. Actually, it's more substantial at the shoulders than the Isas, but I think it is much thinner behind the edge. So I took out the macro and made some choil shots. And since it's fun, some knife porno with closeups from the logos.
Can you check if the first two knives are indeed thinner behind the edge to an extent that explain the difference in behavior? Please note that the perspective is different, I was closer to the first two knives. That can warp the impression when comparing them directly.
1. Denka Nakiri.
Togashi Shirogami K-Tip Gyuto
Spare Honyaki: Less easy-going than the others, but still quite good.
Isas Honyaki. This one just doesn't do it for me really with dense vegetables.
Hi guys,
I wonder why two new knives I got don't exactly perform as I was expecting. Please note that this is not a criticism of the knives, which certainly are great, but an attempt to understand some of the finer points of knife geometry and performance.
The knives in question are two MCX Honyaki Gyutos which I recently got. One by Spare, one by Isasmedjan. Both are very well-made knives, it shows in every detail. But with denser vegetables, they don't go through as easily as my two most used knives are going through. These two are a Denka Nakiri and a Togashi K-Gyuto.
So, what's my point? For most cooking tasks, they perform very close to each other.
But it's with denser vegetables that the two Gyutos don't go through nearly as easily as I would have thought. I do a lot of julienned carrots, and here they require more pressure to go thorugh than I'm used to. Which is especially not ideal when you have stacked the layers. I think it's fair to rule out sharpness per se, I can elaborate if you want details. I sharpened them all on a 1000 Bester with a one-side refinement on a Rika 5k.
I don't think it's due to knife type - the Togashi isn't a nakiri, after all. Actually, it's more substantial at the shoulders than the Isas, but I think it is much thinner behind the edge. So I took out the macro and made some choil shots. And since it's fun, some knife porno with closeups from the logos.
Can you check if the first two knives are indeed thinner behind the edge to an extent that explain the difference in behavior? Please note that the perspective is different, I was closer to the first two knives. That can warp the impression when comparing them directly.
1. Denka Nakiri.
Togashi Shirogami K-Tip Gyuto
Spare Honyaki: Less easy-going than the others, but still quite good.
Isas Honyaki. This one just doesn't do it for me really with dense vegetables.