Thanks Ian. I guess I get wound up with both sides when the use "science" to explain past events that they (seemingly) have no effing idea about and with no regard to the consequences of their "solutions".
I'm a simple old man but do remember when science could be used as a predictive tool. Can anyone take the available data and predict, accurately, what the Covid rates will be next month and where? There are plenty who will make SWAGs and then use new science to explain why they were wrong - if they even acknowledge they were wrong.
In the real world I've had to compile lists of employees by vax status, submit copies of vax cards (against Fl law by the way), compile lists of vax objections (which will all be denied) and have to be prepared to lose all non-vax employees on Dec 5. Merry Christmas. My company has been very clear that they will fight any unemployment action based on the employees vax choice. All while Covid vax mandates are on hold through court challenge. And yes, I'm dusting off resume.
I'm a simple old man but do remember when science could be used as a predictive tool. Can anyone take the available data and predict, accurately, what the Covid rates will be next month and where? There are plenty who will make SWAGs and then use new science to explain why they were wrong - if they even acknowledge they were wrong.
In the real world I've had to compile lists of employees by vax status, submit copies of vax cards (against Fl law by the way), compile lists of vax objections (which will all be denied) and have to be prepared to lose all non-vax employees on Dec 5. Merry Christmas. My company has been very clear that they will fight any unemployment action based on the employees vax choice. All while Covid vax mandates are on hold through court challenge. And yes, I'm dusting off resume.