The market definitely seems to be challenging on a couple dimensions:
- A few very hyped makers sell out instantly and willingness to pay is very high. (Kamon, Yanick)
- Another few hyped makers also sell out instantly but have maintained prices at more reasonable levels. (Shihan, Kippington)
- A lot of up and coming makers with very competitive pricing putting pressure on everyone else. (Spåre, Eddie when they first came on the scene)
- A lot of less-hyped maker knives available on the secondary markets at good prices.
So I can really see why makers who aren't in the first three categories are struggling. From the consumer perspective, unless something really speaks to me, why pay $600-700 to a solid but non-hyped maker vs. $350 for something similar from an up-and-comer? Or used on BST?
For me, $500-600 is the high end of what I'm willing to pay for a maker that has a very strong reputation, matches my taste, and that I'm confident I can resell easily if needed. For newer or lower-profile makers, my bar is more like $350-400 unless they're doing something really cool.
Thing is, how do you distinguish the up-n-comers from the shooting stars (folks who make good stuff for a brief spell and then do something to ruin their cred?)
Imo there is an irreducible element of speculation there.
Of course, if you’re buying a knife for your lifetime or as a gift to friends or family, the speculation goes away.
Most of us here, I imagine, operate differently. I am in my happy place when i can buy knives across the spectrum, gain a broad perspective, then sell the ones that are not my cuppa tequila for reasons other than quality — and not take to big a hit.
Example: I bought one knife by a shooting star (CJA) for much money before I found out he poo’d the bed. I doubt I could realize half the cost in a BST. Objectively it is a pretty thing, well-made, obviously many hours of handwork, and it does the job with flair.
Soooo I’m classing it with the keepers and likely bequests to one of my kids.
Another previously respected maker is featured in the posts of the last few days, with the consensus that his poor business acumen is reducing the value of his work independent of whether the articles are better, worse, same as the ones that got him noticed originally.
My son is talented in the kitchen, but has a fair bit on his plate and evinces no interest in learning to sharpen. He’s ok with a block set in 3Cr13, and as a (trying to be) good parent, I’m not gonna argue religion. He has used my obsessively sharp cutlery and does not feel the same draw. He still turns out amazing food, which, like the hokey-pokey, is what it’s all about.
My daughter is chin-deep in building a career and a marriage, so I’ll sound her out once she has the luxury of switching from boost to cruise.
This post became a bit of a Disney ride, but to circle back, I have no idea how one sorts the sheep from the goats in this instance.