Recommendations for large steel or cast iron pan?

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Chasingsharpness

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
Messages
388
Reaction score
340
Location
UK
I'm looking for a large pan to prepare several portions at once for meal prep.

Im trying to minimise plastics in the kitchen as much as I can so was looking to avoid anything with a chemical non stick coating such as teflon.

Does anyone have any recommendations for a large volume pan or work in a material such as cast iron or stainless steel?

To clarify, ideally looking for something fairly wide with fairly high walls. Basically something that can hold alot of total volume food such as a very large stir fry.
 
Last edited:
You'll need to be more specific. Are you looking for a large frying surface with low sides, something that can hold large amounts of liquid, or something that's sort of in between (like a tall frying vessel)?
 
if you’re looking for a skillet, I really like the Field No. 12: https://fieldcompany.com/collection...MI7NXQqLOwhwMVVyvUAR2pMw8TEAAYASADEgKOLPD_BwE

Lots of area to cook, smoother surface and lighter than most cast iron (no cast iron this size is what I would call light).

For less money, the Darto paella pan is also really handy for large batches, if you’re okay with loop handles. The cooking surface will be smoother than cast iron, but everything else is rougher/sharper and may require a little smoothing of the edges on delivery, but substantially cheaper than many similar sized options.

Field, Smithey, and Lodge also make 16 inch skillets with double loop handles. These are truly monsters and in my experience too large for a residential stove to really handle, so you would need to either have a dedicated outdoor burner or live fire set up to justify going that route.

For griddles, check out Steelmade. They have a normal and thicker pro version that appears to be very well made and reasonably priced.

I’ve got one of these https://a.co/d/iA9fnEq and it’s pretty good, but can warp if you don’t heat slowly and evenly.
 
Should have added that all the above are carbon steel or cast iron. If you’re using a lot of acidic ingredients, then a large all clad or demeyere may be a better fit. For all clad, I like the D5 line and they’re currently having a factory sale with some good deals. I’ll let others chime in on demeyere, since I haven’t used them before.
 
Thank you for the information and the replies,

Just to clarify I was ideally looking for something with decently high walls so that it could hold and mix large amounts of food such as a large stir fry.

I will look at the suggestions for the links above, thank you for providing them. I have heard that stainless is better for acidic ingredients, something for me to consider as I cook with alot of onions and sometimes tomatoes.
 
Look at De Buyer Mineral B Country pan. Comes in 28 and 32 sizes....
Fairly affordable, but because it's carbon steel it's not ideal for everything.
For a stainless alternative, Demeyere has an 28 cm saucier in the Apollo line... but the downsides there are that it doesn't have a pouring rim, nor an encapsulated rim (so just like the Debuyer it won't play nice with dishwashers).
Made-in makes something similar (I think they call it a 5 qt saucier) but it'll be expensive if you're not in the US. Mauviel also makes an 28 cm saucier but it's really expensive. Similar problem with the copper versions Falk makes.

Going really large diameter though you also have to keep into account the diameter of your burners / coils. Especially with relatively poor conductors like carbon steel and cast iron there's a limit where it stops making sense.
 
https://www.netherton-foundry.co.uk/shop/iron-frying-pans/cooking-fires
https://www.netherton-foundry.co.uk/shop/double-handle-pans/paella-pan

netherton foundry bristol makes a spun iron (shaped on a lathe, similar to carbon steel) 3mm pan in 36cm for less than 100 pounds, with a long handle or small side handles. i have other carbon steel makers i like, but they are from the US and i don't think you want to pay the shipping. i don't like cast iron so can't help you there. don't worry about acidic food, doesn't really make sense to buy something just to cook tomatoes..
 
'Perfect for ranges and induction hobs' .... except that most induction hobs have coils that are 21 cm tops... so most of the extra surface you get will be cold and completely useless. 🤷‍♂️
Even on a double ringed gas burner you already notice the outsides are getting less hot on a 32 cm pan.
This sort of thing IMO only makes sense as an oven or bbq pan, or when you really have a special burner that can actually accomodate its size.
 
'Perfect for ranges and induction hobs' .... except that most induction hobs have coils that are 21 cm tops... so most of the extra surface you get will be cold and completely useless. 🤷‍♂️
Even on a double ringed gas burner you already notice the outsides are getting less hot on a 32 cm pan.
This sort of thing IMO only makes sense as an oven or bbq pan, or when you really have a special burner that can actually accomodate its size.
Fing yuge wok and the burner for a turkey fryer. For outdoor use only.
 
Thank you for the information and the replies,

Just to clarify I was ideally looking for something with decently high walls so that it could hold and mix large amounts of food such as a large stir fry.

I will look at the suggestions for the links above, thank you for providing them. I have heard that stainless is better for acidic ingredients, something for me to consider as I cook with alot of onions and sometimes tomatoes.
Cast iron, once seasoned, is fine for onions ime. I don’t cook many tomatoes. Stuff with citrus or vinegar goes into stainless.
 
12" stainless sauté are great for this. I use a disc bottom one for all kinds of things from sautéing larger volumes, shallow/er frying, sauces, stovetop to oven, etc. Very, very handy tool in the kitchen and something I wish I would've gotten so much sooner. I probably use my 12" sauté more than my 12" skillet these days.

Something like this for example:

https://www.amazon.com/YEKSUM-Tri-Ply-Stainless-3-layer-Induction/dp/B0CXSJV79Q/ref=sr_1_6?crid=18RTRHL9GXIIC&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.vj3zaeMnwEKLPnpOiM-GgbRr1wKldG05UVZTm5kt4ZNFj2JCzqo8YXrkmhDB1FO7MRmVPbYPktfAKqAFESn51t8QTMhqWuThVTK6AWlK-AzFzVrDwKEEPjrEsiLCZEWqlIXfJkii_LwAReuvV-QuTiDgkpLCvCcqdH1XaCkLAATA_QhMjr9dRopRfY0AI2ZQ12Ohve6RL3icnokrBp0HHK8FZAsToqDbdO329YfmoIKsNXTYM18Y1NoIoBv0fvWqmJTzBS_qzQNBmfX3qrA8sUY2ORiP_xgcffIwh9TyhOU.RG3RYqrQjJ6E1KpGX0Sbc03nLJaoOdW2N2ABFYlindU&dib_tag=se&keywords=12"+saute+stainless+saute&qid=1721313645&sprefix=12+saute+stainless+saute,aps,257&sr=8-6&th=1

I like straighter walls here and I also see no reason to not go with a disc bottom. Multi-ply sidewalls much of a benefit on these taller pans in my opinion.

A rondeau would be my other recommendation and maybe an even better one. No stick handle which on a pan like this I don't think is any kind of detraction. They are typically heavier and have more ingredients so not a lot of pouring anyway.
 
Woks aren't necessarily great on a lot of consumer stoves / cooktops... small surface area at the bottom makes them a bit suboptimal.
true. but he asked about a vessel without mentioning the heat source, so I ran with it. :D
 
Stir fry is far better done in batches in a wok than with one big pan.

I have a monster pan, a carbon-steel Matfer that's about 18" across. I guess it would be better if I had an 18" heat source. As it is, it is very uneven-heating and warps a bit as I heat. Still handy for heavy browning of stuff that's going into a stock, with timing variations and moving things around, but I can't say I'm happy about the purchase. If you are going to go huge anyway, get something really thick.

Even for things that aren't stir-fry, I'd rather work with multiple pans that are a reasonable fit for my heat source than one big pan.
 
Personally I far prefer pans with a long stick handle over double loop handles (far easier to manipulate the pan with 1 hand), with the only exception stuff that has to go into your oven. I also prefer pans with at least some slope / curve to the walls over a straight wall saute pan, because you can just toss your food instead of having to stir everything with a spatula or a spoon.
If Demeyere made a 28 cm saucier with an encapsulated flared rim I'd be all over that.... but sadly they don't. Almost no one does in fact. :(
 
Alex pole does great carbon steel pans- UK made and solid, love mine but not sure big enough.

Sounds like you want a massive wok- London Chinatown has a pretty decent selection if you want to see them - otherwise online has all the choice you need.


If going stainless id check Nisbets and see what takes your fancy.

I have Samuel Groves laminated - they’re great for most things but the exposed laminate at the rim means I’m wary of putting them through dishwasher
 
i have a 17 inch lodge cast iron. it's main (and really only) virtue is that it is big. i mainly have used it outdoors but i have made large batches of roast potatoes in the oven. but it's pretty heavy, especially laden with food. I mainly use it on the grill where i want to finish side dishes outside and use it to cook different items in different sections like a flat top. honestly, wouldn't recommend it unless the only reason you are buying it is for its massive surface area.

https://www.amazon.com/Lodge-Season...721389347&sprefix=16+inch+lodge,aps,98&sr=8-3
 
If you're contemplating stir-frying, a wok is a natural choice. I've used a 14" Taylor and Ng wok for years and years and liked it a lot. It has a stick handle with helper, and a flat area on the bottom. My nephew asked for a wok last Christmas. I went to a large Asian restaurant supply house to see what they had. They had plenty of big big woks, with metal loop handles, and the full wok bowl shape. The traditional wok shape has lots of reasons for being, so that wasn't a deal-breaker, but I do prefer the stick handle, so I looked online for the exact same wok I had, and got him that, even though it was quite a bit pricier.

I spent quite a bit of time in China in the 1980s and 1990s. Generally, they used spun steel woks. The woks were placed on coal-fired burners with a round opening at the top. The bottom of the wok fit into the opening, so a good portion of the wok is exposed to the extremely hot coal fire. The bottom of the wok would literally get red hot.

That being said, what we might know as a "dish" or one plate of food was usually done one at a time. The really big woks were used for larger portions of various things (like, say, deep-frying a big batch of sesame balls), but not so much for individual dishes. Same thing, if you're cooking a stir-fry at home, if you fill the wok up with a whole lot of food, you're going to end up steaming it more than stir-frying it.

In my own cooking, usually for three or four people, quite often I'm doing things in batches. For instance, one of our common meals is chao fen, or fried rice noodles. I'll cook the noodles in a stock pot and put them aside. I'll soak shitake mushrooms, and then make a sauce with the mushroom water. I'll then braise the tofu in a 12" cast-iron skillet (more on that below). And then I'll cook vegetables- baby bok choy, shitake mushrooms, onions etc- in the wok. Then to serve, I'll heat up the wok hot hot, add some oil, measure out a bowl of noodles, throw them in, then portion out a serving's worth of vegetables/sauce/tofu, and then stir to combine. Repeat for each eater.

The killer set-up, presumably, would be to have a very high-BTU wok burner. They make stoves that have a burner like that- high BTU and shaped to accept the round-bottom wok, combined with other regular burners. Maybe when I replace my current stove! There are also stand-alone wok burners that run on a tank of propane that can be used outside. I might try one of those sometime, to better get the desired "wok hei."

At any rate, it is worth keeping in mind that how big you can go (on the pot) depends on how hot you can go (on the burner).

As I mentioned, I also have several 12" Lodge cast-iron skillets. I use these ALL the time.

My stove is gas, with a respectable output. Where I used to live, I had a stove with a HUGE output. I was sorry to leave that one behind. Anyway, for my setup, I don't think a skillet larger than 12" would be better. It's just hard to get the heat all around when the skillet is so much larger than the burner, as others have mentioned. I find two big skillets very handy, though. For instance, if I'm making migas (eggs, tortilla strips, onions, jalapenos, tomatoes, cheese), I can toast the tortilla strips in one skillet and do the eggs and onions in another. Or, if I'm making burritos, I'll have the filling in one skillet, and warm the tortillas in the other.

I've used stainless skillets (e.g. All-Clad) at other people's houses. Not my bag. In my experience they stick like a mofo. Give me cast iron or carbon steel all day long. Even for eggs. Even for tomatoes. YMMV.

I'd suggest finding your nearest Asian restaurant supply, if you've got one at all locally, and just getting a wok. Either a round-bottom on with the separate ring, or a flat-bottomed one. I can't speak to what sort of cast iron you might have available in the UK, but if you've got decent heat output, I would think a 12" skillet (or two) could be the bees knees. I like my Lodge just fine, but if I had to do it over again, I might opt for one of the more "boutique-y" skillets. Cry once, you know... you're amortizing that sucker over years and years and years of use. My oldest 12" cast iron skillet is 34 years old, and I also use a smaller 6" one that was my great aunt's. It was made in the 1930s.
 
If you're contemplating stir-frying, a wok is a natural choice. I've used a 14" Taylor and Ng wok for years and years and liked it a lot. It has a stick handle with helper, and a flat area on the bottom. My nephew asked for a wok last Christmas. I went to a large Asian restaurant supply house to see what they had. They had plenty of big big woks, with metal loop handles, and the full wok bowl shape. The traditional wok shape has lots of reasons for being, so that wasn't a deal-breaker, but I do prefer the stick handle, so I looked online for the exact same wok I had, and got him that, even though it was quite a bit pricier.

I spent quite a bit of time in China in the 1980s and 1990s. Generally, they used spun steel woks. The woks were placed on coal-fired burners with a round opening at the top. The bottom of the wok fit into the opening, so a good portion of the wok is exposed to the extremely hot coal fire. The bottom of the wok would literally get red hot.

That being said, what we might know as a "dish" or one plate of food was usually done one at a time. The really big woks were used for larger portions of various things (like, say, deep-frying a big batch of sesame balls), but not so much for individual dishes. Same thing, if you're cooking a stir-fry at home, if you fill the wok up with a whole lot of food, you're going to end up steaming it more than stir-frying it.

In my own cooking, usually for three or four people, quite often I'm doing things in batches. For instance, one of our common meals is chao fen, or fried rice noodles. I'll cook the noodles in a stock pot and put them aside. I'll soak shitake mushrooms, and then make a sauce with the mushroom water. I'll then braise the tofu in a 12" cast-iron skillet (more on that below). And then I'll cook vegetables- baby bok choy, shitake mushrooms, onions etc- in the wok. Then to serve, I'll heat up the wok hot hot, add some oil, measure out a bowl of noodles, throw them in, then portion out a serving's worth of vegetables/sauce/tofu, and then stir to combine. Repeat for each eater.

The killer set-up, presumably, would be to have a very high-BTU wok burner. They make stoves that have a burner like that- high BTU and shaped to accept the round-bottom wok, combined with other regular burners. Maybe when I replace my current stove! There are also stand-alone wok burners that run on a tank of propane that can be used outside. I might try one of those sometime, to better get the desired "wok hei."

At any rate, it is worth keeping in mind that how big you can go (on the pot) depends on how hot you can go (on the burner).

As I mentioned, I also have several 12" Lodge cast-iron skillets. I use these ALL the time.

My stove is gas, with a respectable output. Where I used to live, I had a stove with a HUGE output. I was sorry to leave that one behind. Anyway, for my setup, I don't think a skillet larger than 12" would be better. It's just hard to get the heat all around when the skillet is so much larger than the burner, as others have mentioned. I find two big skillets very handy, though. For instance, if I'm making migas (eggs, tortilla strips, onions, jalapenos, tomatoes, cheese), I can toast the tortilla strips in one skillet and do the eggs and onions in another. Or, if I'm making burritos, I'll have the filling in one skillet, and warm the tortillas in the other.

I've used stainless skillets (e.g. All-Clad) at other people's houses. Not my bag. In my experience they stick like a mofo. Give me cast iron or carbon steel all day long. Even for eggs. Even for tomatoes. YMMV.

I'd suggest finding your nearest Asian restaurant supply, if you've got one at all locally, and just getting a wok. Either a round-bottom on with the separate ring, or a flat-bottomed one. I can't speak to what sort of cast iron you might have available in the UK, but if you've got decent heat output, I would think a 12" skillet (or two) could be the bees knees. I like my Lodge just fine, but if I had to do it over again, I might opt for one of the more "boutique-y" skillets. Cry once, you know... you're amortizing that sucker over years and years and years of use. My oldest 12" cast iron skillet is 34 years old, and I also use a smaller 6" one that was my great aunt's. It was made in the 1930s.
Interesting point you raise regarding the heat source. I too was quite sad when I moved houses and no longer had a gas burner. Currently have an electric stove, which I have to admit is considerably less powerful than my old gas stove. Potentially worth re-evaluating the size of the pan. I've also been looking at replacing the stove or perhaps getting one of those standalone induction hobs.
 
Interesting point you raise regarding the heat source. I too was quite sad when I moved houses and no longer had a gas burner. Currently have an electric stove, which I have to admit is considerably less powerful than my old gas stove. Potentially worth re-evaluating the size of the pan. I've also been looking at replacing the stove or perhaps getting one of those standalone induction hobs.
Stand-alone induction all the way - had electric stove in London and pretty much never used it as dumped an induction on top of it and used that for everything
Especially for bigger pans
 
On an electric stove I would absolutely not go for a wok. The small bottom is problematic for performance when you have a small contact surface. Better off going for a big saucier instead. That also applies to induction.
 
On an electric stove I would absolutely not go for a wok. The small bottom is problematic for performance when you have a small contact surface. Better off going for a big saucier instead. That also applies to induction.
Closest thing I know to a wok for an electric/induction burner would be an evasee.
 
Back
Top