Looking forward to comparing these two
Hope you like it, very tough little workhorse.
Really liked it! The S-grind functions really well! The knife is well balanced, light and beautiful! The only thing that might not be the best is the texture in the feather pattern, with some foods, although there is a really nice s-grind,it ends up sticking! Apart from that it works great and it’s really, really, gorgeous! It, feels great! Everything is well done! Great craftsmanship!thoughts on the knife, any comparisons?
Beauty, Now after getting mine in I want cumai and or some s grind in my life from WillMy Newham finally made it through customs - can’t wait to try it out!
Steel: Takefu Vtoku2 core stainless and copper cladding
Tested Hardness: 64 HRC
Here’s Will’s photo first followed by some of mine.
View attachment 213320
View attachment 213323
View attachment 213321
View attachment 213322
View attachment 213324
Beauty, Now after getting mine in I want cumai and or some s grind in my life from Will
Honestly I think this is a better idea, some of the S-grind leaves me worry they'd fold like a Takeda, leaving the front and end intact would help with the structural integrity. Tho I only have the chance to try a Takeda and LaSeur P grind, not sure how other S-grind feels.What convinced me to try his s-grind is that the grind is the same as his regular convex knives, he just adds the fuller. So there’s no additional thickness behind the edge. Food release may not be as good as a traditional s-grind but should be better and hopefully with no loss of cutting performance.
Toyama Damascus are notorious for coming scuffed up.Toyama damascus gyuto, Black Friday purchase from JNS, 243x54, 245g. The finish is pretty scuffed up, but just all the more reason to start using it and get that iron cladding patina'd up. Feels good, has some heft to it!
View attachment 213182
View attachment 213183
Good to know, I'll take it as par for the course then! And the notorious 'zero edge' is apparent on this one, think I'll put a little micro-bevel on it before using.Toyama Damascus are notorious for coming scuffed up.
Mazaki, very pointy boi.Looks very nice. Pardon my ignorance, what is it?
That thing cost about as much as half the knives on one of my magnetic blocks. I think I like my minnow pond. edit: never mind I'm slow, but the first thing that popped up when I searched for it sure did. I prefer the slow death of boiling myself as a frog rather than going for the jugular. I'm not sure I could drop over 1k on a kitchen knife in a single go, especially since I don't even cook. No problem spending that in a couple weeks on 3 knives tho. I do that a lot apparently.Mazaki, very pointy boi.
Are you looking at his Damascus or Hon-Sanmai? His regular white 2 is cheaper than Sukenari.That thing cost about as much as half the knives on one of my magnetic blocks. I think I like my minnow pond.
Thanks for the link. That's a pretty sweet looking thing. I'm just learning about it but it looks like a cool like alternative to something like a Yoshikane, which I am familiar with.Are you looking at his Damascus or Hon-Sanmai? His regular white 2 is cheaper than Sukenari.
https://knivesandstones.us/collecti...ucts/mazaki-white-2-gyuto-migaki-finish-210mm
aren't remotely like each other? Okay. In what way? Other than pointy tip and the choil relief. I'd love to know what makes them so different.Mazaki and Yoshikane aren't really remotely like eachother; they're completely different knives.
Problem solvedToyama Damascus are notorious for coming scuffed up.
Depends on year and rendition of the Mazaki you are talking about, these two are gone now but they are two completely different critters.aren't remotely like each other? Okay. In what way? Other than pointy tip and the choil relief. I'd love to know what makes them so different.
Far as I can tell they look... ehh.. interchangeable aside from those relatively minor details. Same core steel, of course. Same basic profile. Virtually identical proportions. Virtually identical grinds. Virtually identical length. Virtually identical distal taper. Identical weight. etc. So lets have a look at the stats for the 210, I hadn't even looked at these until I saw you comment btw:
3 grams difference in weight, as a percentage that's 1%. They are virtually identical. 4 mm difference in total length. Here is one legit difference: The mizkai is a bit taller, 50 mm vs 45, but on the 240 they nearly converge here. That said, because it's the mizaki that's got the extra length, the proportions are... virtually identical. Moving on... Spine above heel; both 4mm, identical. Spine at the middle; both 2 mm, identical. Width at the tip; both .08, identical.
For two knives that aren't "remotely like each other" they sure do appear to be virtually identical in every measurable way.
Depends on year and rendition of the Mazaki you are talking about, these two are gone now but they are two completely different critters.
maybe this helpsSometimes I feel like the guy sitting quietly when everybody at the dinner table is going on and on about how they taste blueberries and vanilla and hints of cinnamon and just a whiff of cardamom in some fancy wine. Meanwhile it just tastes like wine to me.
Sorry those two look just the same to me except one is shorter. I guess this why I keep buying knives with different cladding like copper, so my apparently very lame sense of discernment has huge differences to pick out.
I’m starting a club for people who can’t tell knives apart, @gc0220 - are you in?
I've had two Mazakis and two Yoshikanes and the examples I had were quite different. My Mazakis were heavier by a solid margin (175g vs 125g for a 210 for example), thicker spines with more continuous distal taper, more of a midweight grind, thinner tips, more curved profile, and more solid/robust feeling in general. Oh and it's ironclad.aren't remotely like each other? Okay. In what way? Other than pointy tip and the choil relief. I'd love to know what makes them so different.
Far as I can tell they look... ehh.. interchangeable aside from those relatively minor details. Same core steel, of course. Same basic profile. Virtually identical proportions. Virtually identical grinds. Virtually identical length. Virtually identical distal taper. Identical weight. etc. So lets have a look at the stats for the 210, I hadn't even looked at these until I saw you comment btw:
3 grams difference in weight, as a percentage that's 1%. They are virtually identical. 4 mm difference in total length. Here is one legit difference: The mizkai is a bit taller, 50 mm vs 45, but on the 240 they nearly converge here. That said, because it's the mizaki that's got the extra length, the proportions are... virtually identical. Moving on... Spine above heel; both 4mm, identical. Spine at the middle; both 2 mm, identical. Width at the tip; both .08, identical.
For two knives that aren't "remotely like each other" they sure do appear to be virtually identical in every measurable way.
I see yeah, it says the Maza has been under continuous development like a Debian rolling release or something. As far as the point about heel height, you would be correct, however the taller blade was proportionally longer as well and therefore the general proportion of the two knives came to be virtually identical. Basically the very similar, one with a pointy tip.I've had two Mazakis and two Yoshikanes and the examples I had were quite different. My Mazakis were heavier by a solid margin (175g vs 125g for a 210 for example), thicker spines with more continuous distal taper, more of a midweight grind, thinner tips, more curved profile, and more solid/robust feeling in general. Oh and it's ironclad.
Also, 5mm at the heel may sound trivial, but it's a big difference in use. Honestly most of the differences we nerd out on are very small dimensionally - an extra mm on the spine, a few tenths of an mm in grind thickness, a few degrees difference in profile - but make a tangible difference in the user experience.
This is not how proportions work. 5 mm in length is not the same as 5 mm in height, that would only work if your length and height were the same. Your knife is not a square. Here's an excellent thread on the subject Rambling thoughts on gyuto profilesI see yeah, it says the Maza has been under continuous development like a Debian rolling release or something. As far as the point about heel height, you would be correct, however the taller blade was proportionally longer as well and therefore the general proportion of the two knives came to be virtually identical. Basically the very similar, one with a pointy tip.
Enter your email address to join: