So the title statement so often ends with something very close to, "...an eight inch chef's knife/gyuto, a bread knife, and a pairing knife."
Okay, yeah, fair enough. Hard to really argue too hard against that trio providing good service across a broad spectrum but it is surely not absolute truth.
So, in the spirit of a bit of fun, but also still having a bent of legitimacy, how would you change that up and feel that the average home user will still get a ton of regular/routine use out of the trio you recommend? For example, I rarely use my bread knife. I mean, maybe a few times a year. Does that really need to be in my trio of knives I really need? Sure, when I do need it, I really need it, but it sees so little use it's difficult for me to imagine it replacing something else that I use all the time.
I think a case could be made for the trio to be:
1. A 240mm+ sujihiki
2. A nakiri
3. A 120mm+ petty
1. In full disclosure, I don't currently own a sujihiki, but I do have a thin western slicer and get the concept of use. People cook lots of roasts, boneless chicken, etc. The sujihiki covers your general slicing, especially for larger cuts. And a good, sharp, thin edge can cut a lot of hard crust!
2. The nakiri fills the predominant general purpose role. The bulk of my prep work is veggies, herbs and fruit. I don't need a gyuto for that. I love the tall blade and push-cutting suits me right down to the ground. No trouble with steaks, chicken breasts, etc. either and the nakiri cops have never come a'knockin' when I use one for such things.
3. In this recommendation, the petty selection becomes pretty important. As much as, if not more than the chef knife/gyuto in the "traditional" recommendation. Because the petty now has to pretty adaptable. Long enough to handle some bigger tasks but still nimble enough for more classic pairing knife work. Maybe in a steel that allows some poultry break down and such.
Whatchya think? What do you think of my recommendations? How would you change up the "Truth Is Trio"? Are there specific models you think would fit your trio? Why?
Okay, yeah, fair enough. Hard to really argue too hard against that trio providing good service across a broad spectrum but it is surely not absolute truth.
So, in the spirit of a bit of fun, but also still having a bent of legitimacy, how would you change that up and feel that the average home user will still get a ton of regular/routine use out of the trio you recommend? For example, I rarely use my bread knife. I mean, maybe a few times a year. Does that really need to be in my trio of knives I really need? Sure, when I do need it, I really need it, but it sees so little use it's difficult for me to imagine it replacing something else that I use all the time.
I think a case could be made for the trio to be:
1. A 240mm+ sujihiki
2. A nakiri
3. A 120mm+ petty
1. In full disclosure, I don't currently own a sujihiki, but I do have a thin western slicer and get the concept of use. People cook lots of roasts, boneless chicken, etc. The sujihiki covers your general slicing, especially for larger cuts. And a good, sharp, thin edge can cut a lot of hard crust!
2. The nakiri fills the predominant general purpose role. The bulk of my prep work is veggies, herbs and fruit. I don't need a gyuto for that. I love the tall blade and push-cutting suits me right down to the ground. No trouble with steaks, chicken breasts, etc. either and the nakiri cops have never come a'knockin' when I use one for such things.
3. In this recommendation, the petty selection becomes pretty important. As much as, if not more than the chef knife/gyuto in the "traditional" recommendation. Because the petty now has to pretty adaptable. Long enough to handle some bigger tasks but still nimble enough for more classic pairing knife work. Maybe in a steel that allows some poultry break down and such.
Whatchya think? What do you think of my recommendations? How would you change up the "Truth Is Trio"? Are there specific models you think would fit your trio? Why?
Last edited: