Nakiri - 165mm vs 180mm

Kitchen Knife Forums

Help Support Kitchen Knife Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I have both a 170 and a 180. The difference isn’t really noticeable in use, but if I could only have one then definitely the 180.
 
I mean, 180 already isn't very long... if you have a totally straight nakiri, you have more (all) flat-spot. But you can't rock at all. And if you have a nakiri with a curve, the part hitting the board becomes even smaller.
 
This so far has been my perfect profile nakiri:
146946-20211222-131633.jpg


Kono FM 195. 183 measured along the edge. Good flat at the back for push cutting, but a nice curve up to the tip so you can rock it as well.

And the extra length over a 165 is oh-so-nice.
 
I have a 165mm Nakiri.

Bought a 240mm soon after.

No regrets on the second one (also no regrets with the first one, since it was about $65 all in).
 
Another vote for shorter nakiris. I tend to rock to go through dense produce (e.g dicing a pumpkin/squash), a long blade would just get in the way. I prefer a dead straight edge 'cause I tend to draw/glide long cuts anyway. Therefore, a humble 150mm dominates my daily tasks, while I'd still reach for my 165mm beater before I even look at my gyutos/cai daos. Open to be corrected of course, but not with my own money :cool: ... Certainly not at the asking prices of fancy 180mm nakiris nahhhh...
 
Last edited:
I find myself really like the 210mm iron clad Toyama Nakiri, not as thin as the Wat 180 but still fall through food. I think a good balance is also important in this kind of decision, even with similar wight I just fine the Toyama Nakiri much better at chopping green onion than CCK 1302, the more forward balance seems to accelerate the action and made the chopping much easier.
 
Back
Top